Skip to main content
iRubric: Mock IEP Project rubric

iRubric: Mock IEP Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Mock IEP Project 
Mock IEP Project
Small groups of students will plan and develop an IEP for an assigned case. The case study will be presented as a mock IEP conference in class for a total of 25 points. In addition, students will turn in their written curriculum-based goals and objectives for their assigned case for an additional 25 points.
Rubric Code: G243277
By Corgimom523
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate


Powered by iRubric IEP Oral Presentation
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Target

5 pts

Organization

Unacceptable

Listeners can follow less than 50% of the information presented. The logic of information is not made clear
Acceptable

Listeners can follow at least 50% of information presented. A few minor points may be confusing.
Target

Listeners can follow at least 95% of information presented.
Style

Unacceptable

Presentation consistently is too elementary or too sophisticated for its purpose. Information is read to audience. Presenters are obviously anxious and cannot be heard.
Acceptable

Level of presentation is generally appropriate. Aspects of presentation seem too elementary or too sophisticated for its purpose. Presenters seem slightly uncomfortable at times. The audience occasionally has trouble hearing the presentation.
Target

Level of presentation is appropriate for its purpose. Presentation is a planned conversation, paced for audience understanding. Speakers are clearly comfortable in front of the class and can be heard by all.
Content: Depth/Accuracy of Content

Unacceptable

No reference is made to key concepts (eligibility, present levels, goals, educational services/placements) to be covered. Information is sufficiently inaccurate that the listener cannot depend on the presentation as a source of accurate information.
Acceptable

For the most part, explanations of key concepts (eligibility, present levels, goals, educational services/placements) are accurate and complete. No significant errors are made. Listeners recognize any errors to be the result of nervousness of oversight.
Target

Speakers provide an accurate and complete explanation of key concepts (eligibility, present levels, goals, educational services/placements). Information presented is consistently accurate.
Personal Appearance and Language

Unacceptable

Personal appearance lacks professionalism and is inappropriate for the presentation and its purpose. Oral language and/or body language frequently reflects bias.
Acceptable

Personal appearance somewhat represents professionalism and for the most part is appropriate for the presentation and its purpose. Oral language and body language are free from bias with one or two minor exceptions.
Target

Personal appearance represents professionalism and is completely appropriate for the presentation and its purpose. Both oral language and body language are free from bias.
Participation

Unacceptable

The student received less than 3 out of 5 on a rating scale submitted by their group members.
Acceptable

The student received at least a 3 out of 5 on a rating scale submitted by their group members.
Target

The student received at least a 4 out of 5 on a rating scale submitted by their group members.
Curriculum Based Goals
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Acceptable

5 pts

Target

10 pts

Written goals

Unacceptable

Goals are written without theoretical understanding (Performance, criterion, time frame). They do not address the child's needs nor are they tied to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills.
Acceptable

Problems with written goals are evident (Performance, criterion, time frame). They are written to address the child's needs but are not accurately tied to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills.
Target

Goals are written with theoretical understanding (Performance, criterion, time frame). They address the child's needs and are tied to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills.
Written objectives

Unacceptable

Objectives are written without theoretical understanding (performance, condition, criterion, consistency). They are not tied to the goals.
Acceptable

Problems with written objectives are evident (performance, condition, criterion, consistency). They are generally tied to the goals.
Target

Objectives are written with theoretical understanding (performance, condition, criterion, consistency). They are tied to the goals.
Curriculum Based Goals
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Target

5 pts

Educationally Relevant

Unacceptable

Less than 75% of the Goals and Objectives are curriculm-based.
Acceptable

75% of the Goals and Objectives are curriculum-based.
Target

90% of the Goals and Objectives are curriculum-based.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2023 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n108