Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: VHS - 2D Unity Game Development rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
VHS - 2D Unity Game Development
VHS - CAD Drawings
Rubric Code:
FXCX426
By
omurphy57
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Unity 2D Game Development
Poor
10 pts
Fair
16 pts
Good
20 pts
Required Components
Poor
Did not fully create a unique game design
using
- Sprites
- Rigid Body/Scripting
- Colliders
Fair
Fully created a unique game design with issues using
- Sprites
- Rigid Body/Scripting
- Colliders
Good
Created a fully functional unique game design using
- Sprites
- Rigid Body/Scripting
- Colliders
Neatness and Accuracy Precision
Poor
Student paid no attention to detail.<BR>
Workmanship and quality was of low standard.<BR>
Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.
Fair
Student did not pay attention to detail.<BR>
Workmanship and quality was of moderate standard.<BR>
Need of improvements were clear and recognizable.
Good
Student paid attention to detail.<BR>
Workmanship and quality was of a high standard.
Problem Solving
Poor
- With prompting, explores possible approaches to solve the problem
Fair
- Draws on prior knowledge and creatively explores possible approaches
- Uses flexible reasoning to uncover novel and diverse approaches for solving the problem
Good
- Persists in the brainstorming process by testing ideas and reconsidering alternatives
- Uses an extended inquiry process, which allows time for incubation of ideas
Persistence
Poor
- With assistance, sets goals and works to accomplish goals
Fair
- Sets goals and works to accomplish goals despite setbacks or frustrations
Good
- Seeks and sets goals and works to accomplish goals despite significant or multiple setbacks or frustrations
Classroom Productivity
Poor
This person did not turn assignment in on time. Was at least 2 weeks late.
Fair
This person turned in assignment late, but within two weeks and was actively working on it to ensure a higher quality product.
Good
This person turned the assignment in on time and with attention to detail and quality craftsmanship.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Exam
Project
Assignment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.