Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric
Scientific Method Project Poster Rubric
Physical Science Poster
Rubric Code:
FXCB6B5
By
Blessings1988
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
FOLDER
Poor
(N/A)
Fair
(N/A)
Good
(N/A)
Excellent
(N/A)
Comments
(N/A)
Problem
3 pts
Poor
Problem is not stated
Fair
Problem is stated, without adequate detail. Very vague.
Good
Problem stated with some clarity.
Excellent
Problem is stated with clarity, full of detail and a foreshadow to the presenter's project.
Comments
_______/3
Hypothesis
3 pts
Poor
Hypothesis is not stated.
Fair
Hypothesis is not clearly stated or well thought-out.
Good
Hypothesis is clearly stated and project supports the testing of the hypothesis.
Excellent
Hypothesis is clearly stated and project supports the testing of the hypothesis. Presentation clearly ties the hypothesis with the experiment design.
Comments
_______/3
Experiment
5 pts
Poor
Experiment was hastily done, and lacks support data. Variables are not stated.
Fair
Experiment was done but support information is lacking. Variables are not stated clearly, or are incomplete.
Good
Experiment was carefully done, and the variables are identified. Supporting data does not make the experimental procedure clear or repeatable.
Excellent
Experiment was scientifically done, and the variables clearly identified. Experiment is repeatable, and new experimental data supports the conclusion.
Comments
_______/5
Data
4 pts
Poor
No data collected or recorded
Fair
Some data collected, but not recorded.
Good
Data has been collected, but does not accurately support the purpose
Excellent
Data has been collected, analyzed and presented.
Comments
______/4
Observations
5 pts
Poor
Observations about the experiment are not stated.
Fair
Observations are not supported by experimental data, or not clearly stated. Project jumps from experiment to conclusion.
Good
Observations are based on experimental data, and are presented. More detail is needed to make a logical conclusion.
Excellent
Observations are based on experimental data, and are clearly presented. Student makes clear scientific observations that support the conclusion.
Comments
______/5
Conclusion
3 pts
Poor
Conclusion is not stated.
Fair
Conclusion is stated but without adequate detail, or not based upon observations made.
Good
Conclusion is valid, logical, and based on observations. Conclusion is stated clearly.
Excellent
Conclusion is valid and logical. Conclusion is based on observations and clearly stated. Student identifies whether or not further research is needed.
Comments
______/3
Scientific Method
3 pts
All steps are used!
Poor
Scientific Method Steps are not included.
Fair
Scientific Method Steps are poorly incorporated. It is not clear whether or not student followed all the steps.
Good
Scientific Method Steps are clearly seen and identified. Content is accurate and well-supported.
Excellent
Scientific Method Steps are fully identified. Content is accurate, comprehensive, and well-supported. One can see every step clearly followed in the project.
Comments
______/3
Presentation
4 pts
Poor
Effort is lacking. Minimal content, no bullet points, no graphics, minimal support information or not very neat.
Fair
Demonstrates some effort. Some good content, bullet points, and graphics. Scientific method is there, but difficult to follow.
Good
Demonstrates good effort. Student put thought in how information would be presented, and the reader can follow the steps of the scientific method.
Excellent
Reader can follow the scientific method easily. Graphics and support data are included in a logical way. The words are clearly and neatly lettered. Excellent job.
Comments
______/4
Total
_______/30
Keywords:
Science Poster Evaluation
Subjects:
Geology
Science
Social Sciences
Vocational
Types:
Project
Presentation
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Geology rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.