Skip to main content
iRubric: “Tell me about yourself” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC

iRubric: “Tell me about yourself” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
“Tell me about yourself” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC 
“Tell me about yourself” Critical Auto-ethnography RUBRIC
Research the approved topic. Submit an autoethnography in one of several modalities . Include a bibliography citing at least 3 resources used researching the topic. Project will be graded on quality of research to support the topic, effective use of information gained through research in addition to students personal narration , credibility of sources, content, grammar and mechanics, and bibliography.
Rubric Code: EXCCB47
By eatonk
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Autoethnography
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 pts

Content

Excellent

--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is analyzed thoughtfully, not just summarized.
--Narratives are written with effective technique, well-chosen details, and subtle organization.
--Vignettes are shared with descriptive elements, well-chosen details, and subtle organization.
Good

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Most researched information is analyzed, some just summarized.
--Narratives are written with acceptable technique, good details, and effective organization.
--Vignettes are shared with acceptable elements, some details, and effective organization.
Fair

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Some information is analyzed, much is just summarized.
--Narratives are written with fair technique, good details, and fair organization
--Vignettes are shared with fair elements, good details, and fair organization.
Poor

--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
--Information is merely stated or summarized.
---Narratives are written with poor technique, minimal details, and poor organization.
--Vignettes are shared with inconsistent elements, minimal details, and poor organization.
Unsatisfactory

--Unclear and inappropriate organization, lacking transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
--All researched information is merely summarized.
--Narratives are written with ineffective technique, ill-chosen details, and little or no organization.
--Vignettes are shared with missing elements, minimal details, and no organization.
Formatting

Excellent

--Video introduction to begin paper is present.
--Paper/project is at least 5 full typed pages.
--Title page is properly formatted.
--double spaced.
--12 pt., Times New Roman.
--1" margins.
--Visually exceptional
Good

--Video introduction to begin paper is present.
--Paper is at least 4 typed pages in length/8 digital slides/pages.
--Title page is properly formatted.
--double spaced.
--12 pt., Times New Roman.
--1" margins
--Visually pleasing
Fair

--Video introduction to begin paper is present.
--Paper is at least 3 typed pages in length.
--Title page is close to the proper format.
-- font and margins partially correct.
--Visually fair
Poor

--Video introduction to begin paper is incomplete or confusing.
--Paper/project is less than 2 typed pages in length.
--Title page is missing.
--font and margins not correct.
--Not visually pleasing
Unsatisfactory

--Video introduction to begin paper is missing.
--Project is not in final-draft form
--does not meet assignment criteria
Grammar and Mechanics

Excellent

--No run-on sentences
--No fragments
--No spelling errors
--No errors in subject/verb agreement, pronouns or tense
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors
Good

--Only one run-on sentence OR only one fragment
--4 or less spelling errors
--4 or less errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
-- 4 or less punctuation or capitalization errors
Fair

--2 run-on sentences OR fragments
--5 or more spelling errors
--5 or more errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
--5 or more punctuation or capitalization errors
Poor

--8 or more run-on sentences OR fragments
--More than 8 spelling errors
--More than 8 errors in agreement, pronouns or tense
-- More than 8 punctuation or capitalization errors
Unsatisfactory

--Grammar and mechanical errors interfere with conveyance of message
Quality of Self-Reflection

Excellent

--Creative representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Multiple representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows thorough, thoughtful representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
--Project synthesizes learning pathways in educational history and connection to teaching philosophy
Good

--Moderate representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Some representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows thoughtful representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
--Project synthesizes learning pathways in educational history and connection to teaching philosophy
Fair

--Basic representation of data (incl. creative writing, images, collage, etc.)
--Minimal representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows incomplete representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
--Project incompletely describes learning pathways in educational history and connection to teaching philosophy
Poor

--Basic representation of data.
--No representations of different data in product (multiple writings, multiple visuals)
--Project shows no representation of research data and findings, as well as evidence of self-reflection and critique.
--Minimal synthesis of educational history and teaching philosophy.
Unsatisfactory

--No evidence of self-reflection, synthesis, or critique.
Works Cited/Citations

Excellent

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No errors in format or punctuation.
Good

--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair

--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor

--No sources properly cited in paper and/or bibliography.
Unsatisfactory

--No source citations



Keywords:
  • Research, autoethnography, language, literacy, education



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16