Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Final Proyect. rubric

iRubric: Final Proyect. rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Final Proyect. Microteaching Performance Assessment Rubric Code: D22A35A By sape2203 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Microteaching
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor or Missing 1 pts
Lesson Aim	Excellent The lesson is based on a clear aim. The aim is complete and well written	Good The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, but it is well written	Fair The lesson is based on an aim. The aim is not clear enough, and it is not well written	Poor or Missing The lesson is not based on an aim.
Content of Lesson	Excellent Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, meets the objective, and is engaging for students	Good One of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, meets the objective, and is engaging for students	Fair Two of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, meets the objective, and is engaging for students	Poor or Missing Three of the following areas are deficient: Content of lesson is grade level appropriate, meets the objective, and is engaging for students
Instructional Components of Lesson	Excellent Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included and effective. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson	Good One of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson	Fair Two or more of the following are missing and/or ineffective: Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson	Poor or Missing Several of the following areas are either missing and/or ineffective. Direct Instruction, Guided Practice, Modeling, and Independent Practice are included. Guiding Questions are incorporated into lesson
Pattern in the lesson.	Excellent The activities in the lesson follow this pattern: 1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic (activity focusing on the language of the lesson) 2.Main activities: activities developing different skills and subskills. 3. Post activities which assess students' learning.	Good The activities in the lesson follow this pattern but without respecting a logical order: 1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic (activity focusing on the language of the lesson) 2.Main activities: activities developing different skills and subskills. 3. Post activities which assess students' learning.	Fair The activities in the lesson follow only two elements of this pattern : 1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic (activity focusing on the language of the lesson) 2.Main activities: activities developing different skills and subskills. 3. Post activities which assess students' learning.	Poor or Missing The activities in the lesson follow only one element of this pattern : 1.Introductory activity: introduction to the topic (activity focusing on the language of the lesson) 2.Main activities: activities developing different skills and subskills. 3. Post activities which assess students' learning.
Quality of Presentation	Excellent Quality of voice, professional behavior, organization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation are evident.	Good One to two of the following are deficient: quality of voice, professional behavior, orgaization, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation	Fair Three of the following are deficient : quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation	Poor or Missing Four or more of the following are deficient or unacceptable: quality of voice, professional behavior, respect for the assigned time, interaction with students, and overall presentation
Preparedness	Excellent The teacher is completety prepared, has rehearsed and respect the assigned time.	Good The the teacher seems pretty prepared but might have needed something more. They respect the assigned time.	Fair The teacher seems pretty prepared but might have needed something more (time to rehearse) and respect the assigned time.	Poor or Missing The teacher does not seem at all prepared to present.
Language Use	Excellent The language used during the lesson is the most suitable according to the students needs and level.	Good The language used during the lesson isn't the most suitable according to the students needs and level. Students have minor problems understanding the teacher.	Fair The language used during the lesson affects the comprehension at some but not the whole information.	Poor or Missing The speech can not be followed because the language is not the appropriate according to students level and needs.

Keywords:

lesson plans, micro teaching

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Test Preparation rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16