Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Video Submission Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Video Submission Rubric
Video Submission Rubric
This rubric is to assist in judging the 2017 Solve for Tomorrow video submissions.
Rubric Code:
CXA3C3C
By
lisakochaud
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
(Other)
Grade Levels:
6-8, 9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria Score
Poor
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Originality & Creativity
Poor
Video does not display originality, innovation or creativity.
Fair
Video has mainly non-original concepts and has little innovation or creativity.
Good
Video has mostly original content, shows moderate innovation and creativity.
Excellent
Video is entirely unique, creative, and innovative. Ideas and information are presented in an interesting way.
Content
Poor
Video does not identify a problem or a proposed STEAM solution.
Fair
Video provides a limited explanation of the problem and showcases a vague description of the STEAM solution.
Good
Video explains the problem being addressed in detail but only moderately explains proposed STEAM solution.
Excellent
Video clearly explains the problem and showcases the STEAM solution being proposed.
Community Impact
Poor
Video showcases no community impact. The project does not identify how the community will benefit and can only be partially executed.
Fair
Video showcases limited community impact. The video identifies how the community will benefit and a project that can be partially executed.
Good
Video showcases moderate potential for community impact. The project (1) identifies how the community will benefit, (2) can be executed and (3) may be continued after the contest.
Excellent
Video shows several, if not all students engaging in hand-on learning during the execution of the solution.
Student Involvement
Poor
The video does not feature student involvement.
Fair
Video features some students engaged in the presentation of information only. There is no hands-on learning.
Good
Video shows very limited student involvement in the implementation of the solution.
Excellent
Video shows several, if not all students engaging in hand-on learning during the execution of the solution.
Production
Poor
Video is not well planned. Poor sound and video. Video plays with errors. Music, images, websites are not credited properly.
Fair
Video shows very little planning. Sound and video quality are somewhat clear and play with some errors. Music, images, websites are credited properly.
Good
Video shows some planning. Sound and video quality allow for clear messaging and play without errors. Music, images, websites are credited properly.
Excellent
Video is well planned. Sound and video quality allow for clear messaging and play without errors. music, images, websites are credited properly.
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More (Other) rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.