Skip to main content
iRubric: Poetry Analysis PowerPoint Presentation rubric

iRubric: Poetry Analysis PowerPoint Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Poetry Analysis PowerPoint Presentation 
Poetry Analysis PowerPoint Presentation
Poetry PowerPoint
Rubric Code: B23X246
By lamees11
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Content:

General
Excellent

All components of presentation are included
Good

One component of presentation is missing:
Fair

2-3 components of presentation are missing (did not follow presentation layout provided)
Poor

More than 3 components of presentation are missing (Assignment was not completed)
Organization

Excellent

Slides were extremely well organized with a logical sequence
Good

Slides were generally well organized with a logical sequence
Fair

Slides were somewhat organized; sequence of slides appeared somewhat random
Poor

Slides were poorly organized; did not follow any logical sequence as layed out in project
Creativity/Layout

Excellent

The presentation is engaging to the audience; excellent use of transitions, graphics, etc to make presentation attractive
Good

The presentation is engaging to the audience; some use of transitions, graphics, etc to make presentation attractive
Fair

The presentation is somewhat engaging to the audience; presentation lacks transitions or graphics that make presentation more attractice
Poor

No real effort to include transitions or graphics within the presentation; slides lacking in creativity
Content:

Poem Analysis
Excellent

Poem was well analyzed; both structure of poem and figurative language devices were correctly determined; continually referred back to poem to point out examples
Good

Poem was adequately analyzed; a few errors were made in regards to determining poem structure or figurative languge; occassionally referred back to poem to point out examples
Fair

Poem was insufficiently analyzed; a number of errors were made in regards to determining poem structure or figurative languge; rarely referred back to poem to point out examples
Poor

No true analysis of poem; no effort was made in regards to determining poem structure or figurative languge; never referred back to poem to point out examples
Literary Devices

Excellent

Forms a creative hypothesis about the symbolic or
metaphorical meaning of the poem and is able to support this with evidence from the text.
Good

Forms a somewhat reasonable hypothesis about the
symbolic or metaphorical meaning and is able to support this with evidence from the work.
Fair

Student identifies the literal meaning of the work and/or
can relate how the work makes him/her feel personally.
Poor

Student finds it difficult to interpret the meaning or
mood of the work.
Oral Presentation

Excellent

The student was well prepared to give presentation; demonstrated a strong knowledge about poem (all information within presentation was familiar)
Good

The student was adequately prepared to give presentation; demonstrated a general knowledge about poem (some information within presentation was unfamiliar)
Fair

The student was somewhat prepared to give presentation; demonstrated a basic knowledge about poem (significant information within presentation was unfamiliar)
Poor

The student was not prepared to give presentation; demonstrated no real knowledge about poem (information contained within presentation was completely unfamiliar)
Time

Excellent

time was between 3-5 minutes
Good

timing was more than 2:30 or more than 5:30
Fair

timing was more than 2:00
Poor

timing was less than 2:00
Q & A

Excellent

Student able to answer question easily
Good

Student able to answer question with some difficulty
Fair

Student able to answer question with difficulty
Poor

student could not answer the question
Group work

Excellent

presentation flowed nicely between the group members
Good

presentation showed collaboration between the group members
Fair

adequate presentation flowed nicely between the group
Poor

appeared to be individually presented
Overall Effort

Excellent

The student put tremendous amount of effort into project & it showed
Good

The student put adequate amount of effort into project & it showed
Fair

The student put insufficient amount of effort into project & it showed
Poor

The student put little or no effort into project & it showed
Total Number of Points




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16