Skip to main content
iRubric: Evolve Facilitator Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Evolve Facilitator Evaluation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Evolve Facilitator Evaluation 
Evaluation of facilitator's ability to train facilitation skills to project specific facilitators
Rubric Code: ZXC88X3
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Evolve Facilitator Evaluation
40 -45 points = pass.
  Poor

After problem areas are discussed and resolved, must retake evaluation.

1 pts

Fair

After problem areas are discussed and resolved, must retake evaluation.

2 pts

Good

Does not need to retake evaluation so long as they are able to provide correct answers to problem areas.

3 pts

Excellent

Does not need to retake evaluation.

4 pts

Classroom Setup and Preparation

Facilitator's classroom setup before session starts - with learning materials and registers available

Poor

Training venue is not set up before hand. Learning materials are not available to delegates.
Relevant posters are not visible in the venue. Attendance registers are incorrect and not available in hard copy.
Fair

Training venue is not completely set up before hand. Learning materials are not printed, bound and are not available to delegates. Relevant posters are not visible in the venue. Attendance registers are available in hard copy.
Good

Training venue is set up before hand. Learning materials are not printed, bound and are not available to delegates. Relevant posters are not visible in the venue. Attendance registers are available in hard copy.
Excellent

Training venue is set up before hand. Learning materials are printed, bound and available to delegates. Relevant posters are visible in the venue. Attendance registers are correct and available in hard copy.
Organization

How outcomes of the facilitation skills course are presented that makes sense.

Poor

Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Fair

Audience has difficulty following presentation because facilitator jumps around.
Good

Facilitator presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.
Excellent

Facilitator presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.
Knowledge of Facilitation Skills

Knows most of the different facilitation techniques and ways to handle difficult scenarios that a facilitator may face in the classroom.

Poor

Facilitator does not have grasp of information; facilitator cannot answer questions about subject nor is able to find how to get the answers.
Fair

Facilitator is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions. Has some concept of how to find appropriate answer.
Good

Facilitator is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to relate to why it would be used for dispatching/call taking purposes. Knows how to find appropriate answers.
Excellent

Facilitator demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration as they relate to call taking/dispatching purposes. Also shows students where to find help information.
Eye Contact/Presence

Understanding people's needs by looking for unsure facial expressions

Poor

Facilitator presents all information without making eye contact to the rest of the group. Constantly doing things that are distracting the audience away from the training. (tapping, fidgetting, moving mouse around areas of the map not in use, etc.)
Fair

Facilitator occasionally uses eye contact. Occasionally does distracting things while presenting. (fidgetting, etc.)
Good

Facilitator maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. Some distractions.
Excellent

Facilitator maintains eye contact with audience, seldom returning to notes. No distractions.
Body Language and Floor Work

Facilitator has a confident body language and is able to move around the floor effectively.

Poor

Facilitator does not present a confident body language and does not move around the floor effectively.
Fair

Facilitator presents a confident body language but does not move around the floor effectively.
Good

Facilitator presents a confident body language and is able to move around the floor.
Excellent

Facilitator presents a confident body language and is able to move around the floor effectively without distracting the delegates.
Elocution

Presents training in a way that relates to facilitators, is audible, good understanding of tools.

Poor

Facilitator mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for delegates in the back of class to hear. Does not provide any examples or scenarios of how the facilitation skills will work with their facilitation goals.
Fair

Facilitator's voice is low. Facilitator incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Provides very little to no examples of how facilitations skills can help with their facilitation goals.
Good

Facilitator's voice is clear. Facilitator pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Provides little examples of how facilitations skills will help their facilitation goals.
Excellent

Facilitator uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Also adds great examples and scenarios of how facilitation skills with help their facilitation goals.
Facilitator's Board Work

The facilitator uses the whiteboard or flipchart effectively in the classroom.

Poor

The facilitator does not use the whiteboard or flipchart.
Fair

The facilitator uses the whiteboard or flipchart. The use of appropriate colours is not applied. Handwriting and positioning of the tools requires practise.
Good

The facilitator uses the whiteboard or flipchart, using appropriate colours. Handwriting and positioning of the tools requires practise.
Excellent

The facilitator uses the whiteboard or flipchart effectively by using appropriate colours, handwriting and positioning of the tools.
Time Management

The facilitator manages their time including the breaks.

Poor

The facilitator does not manage their time and is not punctual including their breaks.
Fair

The facilitator manages their time and is rarely punctual including their breaks.
Good

The facilitator manages their time and is mostly punctual including their breaks.
Excellent

The facilitator manages their time effectively and is punctual including their breaks.
Practical Activities

The facilitator controls and manages practical activities in the classroom situation.

Poor

The facilitator is not able to manage and control practical activities in the classroom.
Fair

The facilitator manages practical activities in the classroom situation.
Good

The facilitator effectively controls and manages practical activities in the classroom situation.
Excellent

The facilitator effectively controls and manages practical activities in the classroom situation.The facilitator is able to think "on their feet" and apply practical solutions to complex situations.
Facilitator's Usage of Tools

Facilitator's ability to use the projector, laptop, electronic content and sound equipment.

Poor

Facilitator is not able to use the projector, laptop, electronic content and sound equipment.
Fair

Facilitator is able to use the projector, laptop, electronic content and sound equipment but with much assistance.
Good

Facilitator is able to use the projector, laptop, electronic content and sound equipment but with some assistance.
Excellent

Facilitator is able to competently use the projector, laptop, electronic content and sound equipment.
Conclusion

Facilitator's effective closing of the session and summary of content.

Poor

Facilitator does not close the facilitation skills session appropriately. Facilitator does not summarise key points nor do they discuss next steps. Facilitator does not thank delegates for their attendance.
Fair

Facilitator closes the facilitation skills session.
Facilitator does not discuss next steps and forgets to thank the delegates for their attendance.
Good

Facilitator closes the facilitation skills session appropriately, summarising key points. Facilitator does not discuss next steps and forgets to thank the delegates for their attendance.
Excellent

Facilitator closes the facilitation skills session appropriately, summarising key points. Facilitator discusses next steps and thanks the delegates for their attendance.
Programme Evaluation Form

Facilitator explains the purpose of the evaluation form and provides sufficient time for the delegates to complete the form.

Poor

Facilitator does not explain the purpose of the evaluation form and does not provide sufficient time for the delegates to complete the form.
Fair

Facilitator explains the purpose of the evaluation form but does not provide sufficient time for the delegates to complete the form.
Good

Facilitator does not explain the purpose of the evaluation form but does provide sufficient time for the delegates to complete the form.
Excellent

Facilitator explains the purpose of the evaluation form and provides sufficient time for the delegates to complete the form.
Facilitator's Portfolio of Evidence

Portfolio of Evidence containing learning materials, attendance registers, programme evaluations and visual aids.

Poor

POE contains no learning materials, attendance registers, programme evaluation forms or visual aids. The POE is not in a file in an organised manner.
Fair

POE contains learning materials. The POE materials are combined but not in a file.
Good

POE contains learning materials, attendance registers, programme evaluation forms. The POE is arranged in a file.
Excellent

POE contains learning materials, attendance registers, programme evaluation forms and visual aids. The POE is neatly arranged in a file in an organised manner.
Facilitator's Toolkit for Delegates

Facilitator provides a toolkit for delegates that will be facilitating the content.

Poor

Facilitator does not provide a toolkit for delegates that will be facilitating the content.
Fair

Facilitator some content for delegates that will be facilitating the content.
Good

Facilitator provides a toolkit for delegates that will be facilitating the content.
Excellent

Facilitator provides a comprehensive toolkit for delegates that will be facilitating the content.



Keywords:
  • Software, Evaluation, Train-the-Trainer, Facilitator







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16