Skip to main content
iRubric: Compare/Contrast Poster rubric

iRubric: Compare/Contrast Poster rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Compare/Contrast Poster 
Compare/Contrast Poster
Students are to compare and contrast hand drafting to AutoCAD or computer aided drafting.
Rubric Code: ZXBXC4C
By Talesian
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric C/C Poster
  Excellent - 4

100 pts

Good - 3

75 pts

Fair - 2

50 pts

Poor - 1

25 pts

Comparison points

Excellent - 4

There are (4) four clear comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Good - 3

There are (3) three comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Fair - 2

There is (1) one comparison example between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poor - 1

Student has not provided any comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Contrasting points

Excellent - 4

There are (4) four clear contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Good - 3

There are (3) three clear contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Fair - 2

There is (1) one clear contrasting example between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poor - 1

Student has not provided any contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poster Structure

Excellent - 4

Student has included a title and distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There is cohesion in the poster and all the points make sense. There are no (or very few) grammar mistakes, and they do not take away from the overall poster.
Good - 3

Poster reflects a title and some distinction between the comparisons and contrasts. Cohesion is mostly present throughout the poster. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall poster.
Fair - 2

There is no title and no distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall poster.
Poor - 1

There isn't any real form or format to the information of the poster. Grammar is poor and makes the information difficult to understand.
Poster Creativity

Excellent - 4

Poster shows creativity and is aesthetically pleasing.
Good - 3

Poster shows some creativty and is kind of aesthetically pleasing.
Fair - 2

Poster shows limtied creativity and is not really aesthetically pleasing.
Poor - 1

The poster shows no creativity and is not aesthetically pleasing.
Creativity of presentation/Intro

Excellent - 4

Original presentation and creativity shown in presentation, unlike anyone else in the class. Outstanding Introduction.
Good - 3

Original presentation and creativity shown in presentation. Good Introduction.
Fair - 2

Plain presentation, somewhat monotone speech, a little creativity shown in presentation. Small introduction.
Poor - 1

No originality/creativity shown in presentation. No Introduction.
Presentation Aesthetics

readability and flow
Excellent - 4

The presentation clearly renders knowledge of hand drafting and computer aided drafting. Poster is easy to follow while students is speaking and voice levels are great.
Good - 3

Much thought given to poster design and the presentation renders a great deal of knowledge on hand drafting and computer aided drafting. Student is flowing smoothly throughout.
Fair - 2

The presentation gives some knowledge of hand drafting and computer aided drafting. The poster is incomplete or hard to follow and/or it is difficult to see. Student is having some difficulty speaking.
Poor - 1

The presentation is incomplete or missing. There are multiple grammar errors while speaking.
Effectiveness of Presentation

Student engagement
Excellent - 4

Audience is engaged and have questions to ask.
Good - 3

Audience is engaged. No questions to ask.
Fair - 2

Audience is somewhat engaged but seem confused about the information being presented.
Poor - 1

Audience is not engaged or paying attention to the speaker.
Dress Attire (Business Casual

Excellent - 4

Dressed in Business Casual attire.
Good - 3

Dressed partically Business Casual attire.
Fair - 2

Dressed in Business Casual attire with inappropriate shoes.
Poor - 1

In appropriate school attire only.



Keywords:
  • Compare/Contrast Essay, Romeo and Juliet, Writing, Essays, English, Technology



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16