- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Cardboard Chair Design and Construction rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Cardboard Chair Design and Construction Cardboard Chair Design and Construction This is the scoring rubric for the Cardboard Chair Design and Construction Rubric Code: ZXB2X7B By lisakduffy Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Engineering Type: Project Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Cardboard Chair
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Design Concept	Poor Built chair design concept is not in line with the finalized submitted sketches.	Fair Built chair design concept somewhat matches the finalized submitted sketches.	Good Built chair design concept matches the finalized submitted sketches exactly.
Build Constraints	Poor Chair build contains materials other than cardboard and glue throughout.	Fair NA	Good Chair is built with cardboard and glue only, and no sign of other materials or adhesives.
Weight constraint	Poor Chair is unable to hold to hold the 100lb weight.	Fair Chair build is able to hold the 100lb weight with some visual stress on the chair.	Good Chair build is able to hold equal to or greater than the 100lb weight.
Ergonomics	Poor Chair is uncomfortable to sit in and difficult for most to get in and out of.	Fair Chair is comfortable to sit in for a short period of time and easy for most to get in and out of.	Good Chair is comfortable to sit in for a long period of time and easy for all to get in and out of.
Quality of construction	Poor Edges are rough, adhesive is messy, and the quality of construction is poor and messy.	Fair Some edges are rough, and adhesive is mostly neat. Some parts of construction could use improvement.	Good Cuts that are made are straight and smooth. Adhesive is clean and neat. Overall construction is well done.
Aesthetically pleasing	Poor Chair's design is not pleasing to look at and would not be something someone would want to have in a room.	Fair Chair's design is slightly pleasing to look at and some design elements are apparent.	Good Chair's design is pleasing to look at and appreciative of design.
Participation	Poor The student participated minimally in the team effort of the chair design and build.	Fair The student participated half the time in the team effort of the chair design and build.	Good The student participated everyday in the team effort of the chair design and build.
Cooperation	Poor The student was not cooperative with their team members or teacher during the project. Student distracted others or caused delays in the project due to their actions.	Fair The student was generally cooperative with their team members or teacher during the project. Student generally did not distracted others or caused delays in the project due to their actions.	Good The student was cooperative with their team members or teacher during the project. Student increased productivity of others and maintained a strong project schedule.