- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Biology SBI4U lab rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Biology SBI4U lab rubric Biology SBI4U lab rubric Evaluating the demonstration of knowledge of course content and its appropiate application Rubric Code: ZXB27X3 By ckincaid1 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Biology Type: (Other) Grade Levels: 9-12

GENERAL EVALUATION TOOL
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Needs Improvement 1 pts	R 0 pts
Intruduction	Excellent 1. Includes the question to be answered by the lab 2. states hypothesis that is based on research and/or sound reasoning 3. title is relevant.	Good One of the "excellent" conditions is not met, two conditions met	Fair Two of the "excellent" conditions is not met , one is met	Needs Improvement Introduction present, no exemplary conditions met	R Did not attempt
Methods	Excellent Description or step-by-step process is included, could be repeated by another scientist	Good Description included, some steps are vague or unclear	Fair The description gives generalities, enough for reader to understand how the experiment was conducted	Needs Improvement Would be difficult to repeat, reader must guess at how the data was gathered or experiment conducted	R Did not attempt
Data and analysis	Excellent Results and data are clearly recorded, organized so it is easy for the reader to see trends. All appropriate labels are included	Good student work demonstrates adequate planning, organization and execution of thought	Fair student work demonstrates a lack of adequate planning, organization and execution.	Needs Improvement student work shows no planning, organization or execution	R Did not attempt
Conclusion	Excellent 1. Summarizes data used to draw conclusions 2. Conclusions follow data (not wild guesses or leaps of logic), 3. Discusses applications or real world connections 4. Hypothesis is rejected or accepted based on the data.	Good 3 of 4 of the "excellent" conditions is met	Fair 2 of the 4 excellent conditions met	Needs Improvement 1 of the 4 excellent conditions met	R Did not attempt
Format and Lab Protocols	Excellent Lab report submitted as directed, and on time. Directions were followed, stations were cleaned. All safety protocols followed.	Good Most of the excellent conditions were met; possible minor errors in format or procedures	Fair Some of the excellent conditions met, directions were not explicitly followed, lab stations may have been left unclean or group not practicing good safety (such as not wearing goggles)	Needs Improvement Student did not follow directions, practiced unsafe procedures, goofed around in the lab, left a mess or equipment lost	R Did not attempt