Skip to main content
iRubric: Chief Architect Six Weeks-Project rubric

iRubric: Chief Architect Six Weeks-Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Chief Architect Six Weeks-Project 
Chief Architect Six Weeks-Project
Rubric use to assessment student process and performance completing a construction project or task.
Rubric Code: Z2WAC3A
By bjward64
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Vocational  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Construction- Grading Skills
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Undeveloped

2 pts

Non-Compliance

1 pts

Job Completion

Excellent

The project was 100% complete and worked according to the task description.
Good

The project was complete and worked, but needed minor modifications. Only required 2-3 reclarifications.
Fair

The project was complete but did not work; needed several minor modifications. Required more then 3 reclarifications of task but didn't impact others around him to do task severly.
Undeveloped

The project was complete but did not work; needed several major modifications.
Non-Compliance

Student did not complete project in time period given, refused to start project or abandoned project once started.
Demonstrate Knowledge of Process

Excellent

Student knows and is able to identify and explain necessary theories/ task for completion of the project. Relies on own memory skills to get task done.
Good

Student is able to identify and explain necessary theories/ task for completion of the project with some assistance. Uses own words to describe task.
Fair

Student is unable to identify or explain concepts without major prompting. Requires adult assistance to get job done. Uses very little vocabulary to describe the task.
Undeveloped

Student is not able to both identify and explain major theories/task. Uses others views to explain the task and doesn't complete task on own for any of steps.
Non-Compliance

Student lacked interest in demonstrating knowledge of project and/or process.
Ability to Follow Directions

Excellent

Followed directions to the letter. Used others for guides.
Good

Followed directions. Listened to others around him when needed.
Fair

Moderately followed directions. Worked at a pace that was productive but didn't listen to the adult coaching him or the customer.
Undeveloped

Did not follow directions for any of the task and at times refused to slow down to do task well.
Non-Compliance

Student was non-compliant when given directions 100% of the time.
Level of Needed Assistance

Excellent

Student was able to complete the task without assistance.
Good

Student was able to complete the task with little assistance.
Fair

Student was able to complete the task with moderate assistance.
Undeveloped

Student was unable to complete task without major assistance.
Non-Compliance

Student refused or was unable to start the project when offered assistance/ accomodations
Time Management

Excellent

Routinely used time well throughout the project to get the job done on time.
Good

Used time fairly well throughout the project.
Fair

Procrastinated somewhat but did get the job done on time.
Undeveloped

Was unable to adequately meet timeline due to inablility.
Non-Compliance

Student showed no interest in completing project on time.
Student Attitude During Project

Excellent

Student turned in a project they considered a reflection of their diligent efforts.
Good

Student turned in a project they are pleased with.
Fair

Student turned in a project that is semi-decent to receive a fair grade.
Undeveloped

Student turned in project simply to receive credit.
Non-Compliance

Student refused to complete project
On Task Behavior

Excellent

Student works with enthusiasm and is rarely off task
Good

Student is seldom off task
Fair

Student works with minimal enthusiasm and is often off task.
Undeveloped

Student makes minimal use of in-class work time.
Non-Compliance

Student makes no use of in-class work time.
Floor Plan & Furnishings

Excellent

Floor plan is present and shows adequate furniture, doors, and windows. Furniture is to scale.
Good

Floor plan is present and shows 3-4 pieces of furniture but may be missing doors or windows. Most furniture is to scale.
Fair

Floor plan is present but only shows 1-2 pieces of furniture and/or inaccurate furniture scale. Missing doors/windows.
Undeveloped

Student put little effort in the floor plan process.
Non-Compliance

Floor plan is not present
Principle & Elements of Design

Excellent

All colors for wall, furniture, accessories and textiles are shown, listed and proper color scheme is identified. All other principles and elements of design are represented: Scale, line, shape, size, space, texture, balance, contrast, emphasis, proportion, patterns, and gradient.
Good

Most colors for wall, furniture, accessories and textiles are shown, listed and are pleasing to the eye. Many principles and elements of design are present.
Fair

A few colors are shown and are somewhat pleasing to the eye. Few principles and elements of design are presented throughout project.
Undeveloped

A few colors are shown. Few principles and elements of design are present. Not particularly pleasing to the eye.
Non-Compliance

No colors are shown, listed, and/or no scheme is identified. No attempt to use principles and elements of design.
Furnishing home

Excellent

Interior aesthetics are pleasing and inviting. Use of color and texture adds warmth to each room. Use of furniture, lighting, accessories, and window treatments combines principles and elements with exceptional taste and fitting to the style of the home.
Good

Interior aesthetics are somewhat lacking. Use of color and texture are present but do not emphasize value overall. Use of furniture, lighting, accessories, and window treatments are okay but do not fit the style of the home.
Fair

Interior aesthetics are lacking. Very little use of color and texture. Use of furniture, lighting, accessories, and window treatments are disproportionate and do not fit the style of the home.
Undeveloped

Very little attempt was put forth. Some color and wall texture finishing was attempted. Furnishing of the home lacks aesthetics. Missing accessories.
Non-Compliance

Principles and elements of design are not present within the interior of the finished product.



Keywords:
  • Vermont Standards language: 1.5, 1.8, and to meet transition goals



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98