Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Modern Atomic Theory Rubric

iRubric: Modern Atomic Theory Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Modern Atomic Theory Rubric Modern Atomic Theory Rubric This is a jigsaw activity to help students learn about the modern atomic theory and where it has been dervived from. Rubric Code: YXACA33 By Rockylou22 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Chemistry Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Atomic Theory
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Points Earned (N/A)
Documentation of Events	Excellent Six historical figures are present. This includes date and description.	Good Five historical figures are present. This includes date and description.	Fair Four or fewer historical figures are present. This includes date and description.	Poor Two or fewer historical figures are present. This includes date and description.	Points Earned
Accuracy of information	Excellent All dates indicated on the project are correct and are sequenced in the proper order. Information provided	Good At least one of the dates or sequences is not in the proper order.	Fair At least three of the dates or sequences are not in the proper order.	Poor Four or more of the dates or sequences are not in the proper order.	Points Earned
Requirements	Excellent All required information is accurately included in the project.	Good Most of the required information is accurately included in the project.	Fair Some required information is included in the project. or the information provided was not accurate	Poor Vert little required information is accurately included in the project.	Points Earned
Legibility	Excellent Legible handwriting, typing or printing.	Good Majority of handwriting, typing or printing is legible.	Fair Marginally legible handwriting, typing or printing.	Poor Writing is not legible.	Points Earned
Sources	Excellent Clearly showed two or more credible sources for each six scientists	Good Showed two or more sources for five or less scientists	Fair Showed one source for each six scientists.	Poor Showed one source for five or less scientists	Points Earned
Presentation
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts	Points Earned (N/A)
Content	Excellent Presentation includes useful and relevant information on your scientist and atomic model. Information is well-organized and accurate.	Good Presentation includes relevant information on your scientist and atomic model. Information is accurate.	Fair Presentation includes relevant information on your scientist and atomic model. Some information is inaccurate and poorly organized.	Poor Presentation includes relevant information on your scientist and atomic model.Information is poorly organized and inaccurate.	Points Earned
Work Quality/Effort	Excellent The work done exceeds all expectations and shows that the group is proud of their work. It is clear that the group's best effort was put forth.	Good The work was done with good effort that shows what the group is capable of. It is evident that time was put into this presentation.	Fair Work is done with fair effort, but the quality is still not what the group is capable of. It is evident that the work was rushed.	Poor Work is done with little effort, which resulted in a low quality product. It is evident that the work was rushed and little time was spent on the final product. Work is incomplete.	Points Earned
Presentation	Excellent The group did an excellent job presenting their project to the class. Every member of the group spoke clearly and with expression.	Good The group presented their project very well. Presenters spoke clearly and with expression.	Fair The group did a fair job presenting their project. Presenters were not always clear and spoke with little expression.	Poor The group did a poor job presenting their project. Presenters appeared reluctant to speak and were difficult to understand.	Points Earned
Creativity	Excellent The project is informative and has an abundance of creativity. It is attactive in terms of design, layout and neatness.	Good The project is informative, creative, organized, and neat.	Fair The project has some creativity, neatness, and organizaton, though it may be a bit messy.	Poor The project was done with minimal attention to creativity, neatness, and organization.	Points Earned
Group Work	Excellent The group worked great together and did a stellar job on their project.	Good The group worked well together and did a nice job on their project.	Fair The group did not work well together, but did a nice job on their project.	Poor The group did not work well together and the project reflects this.	Points Earned

Subjects:

Chemistry

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Chemistry rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98