Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: AP Presentational Speaking: Cultural Comparison rubric

iRubric: AP Presentational Speaking: Cultural Comparison rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AP Presentational Speaking: Cultural Comparison Rubric Code: YA69A4 By SenoraJonesPHS Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

Cultural Comparison
	Poor 1 pts	Weak 2 pts	Fair 3.5 pts	Good 4 pts	Strong 5 pts
Treatment of Topic	Poor Almost no treatment of topic within the context of the task	Weak Unsuitable treatment of topic within the context of the task	Fair Suitable treatment of topic within the context of the task	Good Generally effective treatment of topic within the context of the task	Strong Effective treatment of topic within the context of the task
Comparison of Cultures	Poor Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, and may not include examples	Weak Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, but may not compare them; consists mostly of statements with no development	Fair Presents information only about the student's own community or only about the target culture, including a few supporting details and examples	Good Compares the student's own community with the target culture, including some supporting details and mostly relevant examples	Strong Clearly compares the student's community with the target culture, including supporting details and relevant examples
Understanding the target culture	Poor Demonstrates minimal understanding of the target culture; generally inaccurate	Weak Demonstrates a limited understanding of the target culture; may include several inaccuracies	Fair Demonstrates a basic understanding of the target culture, despite inaccuracies	Good Demonstrates some understanding of the target culture, despite minor inaccuracies	Strong Demonstrates understanding of the target culture, despite a few minor inaccuracies
Organization	Poor Little or no organization; absence of transitional elements and cohesive devices	Weak Limited organization; ineffective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices	Fair Some organization; limited use of transitional elements or cohesive devices	Good Organized presentation; some effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices	Strong Organized presentation; effective use of transitional elements or cohesive devices
Comprehensibility	Poor Barely understandable, with frequent or significant errors that impede comprehensibility	Weak Partially understandable, with errors that force interpretation and cause confusion for the listener	Fair Generally understandable, with errors that may impede comprehensibility	Good Fully understandable, with some errors which do not impede comprehensibility	Strong Fully understandable, with ease and clarity of expression; occasional errors do not impede comprehensibility
Vocabulary and idiomatic language	Poor Very few vocabulary resources	Weak Limited vocabulary and idiomatic language	Fair Appropriate but basic vocabulary and idiomatic language	Good Varied and generally appropriate vocabulary and idiomatic language	Strong Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Register	Poor Minimal or no attention to register	Weak Use of register is generally inappropriate for the presentation	Fair Use of register may be inappropriate for the presentation with several shifts	Good Generally consistent use of register appropriate for the presentation, except for occasional shifts	Strong Mostly consistent use of register appropriate for the presentation
Grammar, syntax, and usagea	Poor Little or no control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Weak Limited control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Fair Some control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Good General control of grammar, syntax, and usage	Strong Accuracy and variety in grammar, syntax, and usage, with few errors
Pronunciation, intonation, pacing	Poor Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend; errors impede comprehensibility	Weak Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response difficult to comprehend at times; errors impede comprehensibility	Fair Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response generally comprehensible; errors occasionally impede comprehensibility	Good Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response mostly comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility	Strong Pronunciation, intonation, and pacing make the response comprehensible; errors do not impede comprehensibility
Clarification or self-correction	Poor Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually does not improve comprehensibility	Weak Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility	Fair Clarification or self-correction (if present) sometimes improves comprehensibility	Good Clarification or self-correction (if present) usually improves comprehensibility	Strong Clarification or self-correction (if present) improves comprehensibility

Keywords:

AP, Presentational Speaking, Cultural Comparison

Subjects:

Foreign Languages

Types:

Assessment

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Foreign Languages rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n16