- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Interior Design rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Interior Design Interior Design Rubric Code: Y2X54BW By pharnack23 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Project Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Interior Design
	Below Expectations 10 pts	Needs Improvement 13 pts	Meets Expectations 15 pts	Good 17 pts	Excellent 20 pts
SF of rooms	Below Expectations Missing calculations	Needs Improvement Many calculations not shown or incorrect	Meets Expectations Some calculations not shown	Good Correct calculations with no labels.	Excellent Correct calculations labeled properly All calculations shown Organization of work Accessory materials such as primers, adhesives, or overages noted.
SF of walls	Below Expectations Missing calculations	Needs Improvement Many calculations not shown or incorrect	Meets Expectations Some calculations not shown	Good Correct calculations with no labels.	Excellent Correct calculations labeled properly All calculations shown organization of work Accessory materials such as primers, adhesives, or overages noted.
Use of Excel chart	Below Expectations Functions not used Information is incomplete or missing	Needs Improvement Functions not used Some Information is incomplete or missing Units not shown	Meets Expectations Function used Information is shown units not labeled	Good Function used Information is mainly organized Some units not labeled	Excellent Function used Information is organized All calculations shown All units labeled correctly
Cost of materials	Below Expectations Incorrect calculations	Needs Improvement Correct calculations without the use of decimal points and dollar signs and no labels.	Meets Expectations Correct calculations missing 3-4 with decimal points and dollar signs.	Good Correct calculations missing 1-2 with decimal points and dollar signs.	Excellent Correct calculations labeled fully with decimal points and dollar signs. Accessory materials such as primers, adhesives, or overages noted.
Project Schedule shown	Below Expectations Missing	Needs Improvement 1-2 tasks shown, not in order, not in a time frame. Answer reveals lack of research.	Meets Expectations 2-3 tasks shown, however tasks are not in sequential order and time frame shows a lack of research.	Good 3-4 project tasks shown, in a fairly organized sequence of events. Some events not in sequential order. Time frame is mainly reasonable.	Excellent 5-6+ project tasks shown with a reasonable time fame given in an organized sequence of events.