Skip to main content
iRubric: Artist Research Paper Rubric

iRubric: Artist Research Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Artist Research Paper Rubric 
Rubric Code: Y22CA72
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Excellent

16-20

(N/A)

Very Good

11-15

(N/A)

Average

6-10

(N/A)

Poor

1-5

(N/A)

Unacceptable

0

(N/A)

Summary and Submission
25 %

Excellent

- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use research methods to gather details concerning an artist or artwork
- information is coherent and well supported
- submitted the assignment on time to the course
Very Good

- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use research methods to gather details concerning an artist or artwork
- information is coherent and mostly supported by sources
- Student submitted the assignment on time to the course.
Average

- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use research and course materials to gather details concerning an artist or artwork
- information is coherent and supported by referenced sources
- Student submitted the assignment on time to the course.
Poor

- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use research and course materials to gather details and argues with little understanding of their research topic
- Student failed to submit the assignment on time to the course.
Unacceptable

- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
Content & Development
25 %

Excellent

- Art fully identified: Title; artist, date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Explanation is clear and well written
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
- Responses are excellent, timely and address assignment including course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good

- Art fully identified: Title; artist; date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is accurate and persuasive.
- Explanation is clear
- Major points are stated and supported.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Average

- Art fully identifed: Title; artist; date. (and medium if central to discussion)
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Explanation included but vague.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Poor

- Art not fully identified: Title; artist; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Explanation is unclear and under the length necessary for an appropriate description.
- Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.
- Questions were not adequately answered.
Unacceptable

- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- No formal analysis
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Organization & Structure
25 %

Excellent

-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis statment is clear and relates clearly to the content of the paper
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good

- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis statement is clear and relates to content of the paper. Few
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor

- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- No identifiable thesis.
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
25 %

Excellent

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good

- Mostly Correct Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation,
spelling is correct.
- Language is mostly clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average

- Paper contains Some grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
Clear language
Poor

- Paper contains many grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
somewhat clear language
Unacceptable

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98