Skip to main content
iRubric: Remote Controlled Aircraft Technical Paper rubric

iRubric: Remote Controlled Aircraft Technical Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Remote Controlled Aircraft Technical Paper 
APA Formatted
Rubric Code: XXA9C88
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Super Maneuverability Paper
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Format

Poor

? Headers and margin mostly correct
? Page numbers
? Text double spaced
? Past tense/third person
? Three to five pages
Fair

APA format
? Headers and margin correct
? Page numbers
? Proper subheadings
? Text double spaced
? ? Three to five pages
? Proper grammar and mechanics
Headings
Good

APA format
? Headers and margin mostly correct
? Page numbers in top right corner
? Proper subheadings
? Text double spaced
? Past tense/third person
? Three to five pages
? Proper grammar and mechanics
(mostly collegiate level)
Level 1 headings Introduction, Research, Methods, Results & Conclusion
Excellent

APA format
? Running header ½” from top of page
? Title 1” from top of page
? 1”margin on each side, 0.5” gutter on left
? Page numbers in top right corner
? Proper subheadings
? Text double spaced
? Past tense/third person
? Three to five pages
? Proper grammar and mechanics
(collegiate level)
Level 1 headings Introduction, Research, Methods, Results & Conclusion
Introduction

Poor

?Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
Fair

Heading
? Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
?Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
Good

Heading
? Purpose of the study
? Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
?Hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
? Limitations by which the project will be
confined
Excellent

Level 1 Heading
? Purpose of the study; include value and
contribution of the study
? Conclude with the statement of the
problem and research question
?Clear, specific hypothesis and/or
engineering goals
? Limitations by which the project will be
confined
Research

Poor

? Includes a minimum of 1 source
Fair

Review of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
? Includes a minimum of 1 source
scholarly articles/journals
? Organized
Good

Analysis and synthesis of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
? Includes a minimum of 2 sources
? Organized from general information to
specific:
Excellent

Analysis and synthesis of various studies
of other researchers, experts, and theorists
? Includes a minimum of 3 sources
? Organized from general information to
specific:
Methods - Materials

Poor

Instrumentation
? Numbered list
?at least 1 part that control maneuverability of your aircraft
Fair

Instrumentation
? Numbered list
?at least 2 parts that control maneuverability of your aircraft explained
Good

Instrumentation
? Complete numbered list of specific make and model
?at least 3 parts that control maneuverability of your aircraft explained
Excellent

Instrumentation
? Complete numbered list of specific make and model
?at least 3 parts that control maneuverability of your aircraft clearly and fully explained
Methods - Procedures

Poor

Procedures
? Numbered list of procedures
Fair

Procedures
? Site location or description of the study
? Numbered list of some procedures
Good

Procedures
? Site location or description of the study
? Numbered list of mostprocedures
? Deviations from procedures explained and justified
Excellent

Procedures
? Site location and description of the study
? Complete numbered list of all procedures
? All deviations from procedures explained
and justified
Methods - Solution Selection

Poor

Solutions? ?Selection
? Rationale for final design
Fair

Solutions? ?Selection
? Rationale for final design with some explanation.
Good

Solutions? ?Selection
? Rationale for final design selection that includes justification based on
attributes and drawbacks
Excellent

Solutions? ?Selection
? Rationale for final design selection that includes justification based on attributes and drawbacks
Results

Poor

Visual representation of designs
? Evidence of completed diagram
Fair

Visual representation of designs
? Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
? Comments of design outcomes
Good

Visual representation of designs
? Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
? Comments and observations of design outcomes
include modifications in design
? Some rationale for any program modification from original design
Excellent

Visual representation of designs
? Evidence of completed diagram; can include screenshots
? Comments and observations of design outcomes
Cite major modifications in design
? Rationale for any program
modification from original design
Conclusion

Poor

Summarize includes at least 1 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
? What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
? Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
? What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
? Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
? Future research based on findings
Fair

Summarize includes at least 3 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
? What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
? Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
? What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
? Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
? Future research based on findings
Good

Summarize includes at least 4 of the following
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
? What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
? Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
? What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
? Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
? Future research based on findings
Excellent

Summarize
*Importance of the study
*The purpose
? What was learned/modified/changed
from original design
? Discuss the weaknesses or
inconsistencies in the data
? What was learned, discovered or realized, including any unexpected
findings.
? Recommendations to improve and/or
enhance design/study
? Future research based on findings
In-Text Citations and References

Poor

Minimum of 1 source
? some in-text citations that are somewhat correct
? Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
? References on separate page at the end
Fair

Minimum of 2 sources
? Citation for some references
? Some references have an in-text citation
? Citation format somewhat correct
?Each reference is reputable and appropriate
? Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
? References on separate page at the end
Good

Minimum of 3 sources
? Citation for each reference
? Most references have an in-text citation
? Citation format mostly correct
? Citation appropriate and related to the research
? Each reference is reputable and appropriate
? Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated
Excellent

Minimum of 3 sources
? Citation for each reference
? Each reference has an in-text citation
? Citation format correct
? Citation appropriate and related to the research
? Each reference is reputable and appropriate
? Others’ ideas should be appropriately cited; plagiarism will not be tolerated




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98