Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric for Guiding the PSEQ
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric for Guiding the PSEQ
Rubric for Interview Techniques
Activity 1: Candidates have to assist a Grade 12 pupil in the completion of Workbook1 PACE Self-Exploration Questionnaire
Rubric Code:
XXA3XW9
By
rufiadv
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
ePortfolio
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criteria for Interviewing Skills
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Total Points
(N/A)
-A review of leaner needs
Poor
Poor discussion of learner’s
growth and development,
the counseling theory utilized,
the identified presenting
problem, the session goal, longterm
goals, a plan for
counseling, and ethical concerns
considered
Fair
Overview of client’s human
growth and development, the
counseling theory utilized, the
identified presenting problem,
the session goal, long-term
goals, a plan for counseling, and
ethical concerns considered
Good
Clear, delineated discussion of
client’s human growth and
development, the counseling
theory utilized, the identified
presenting problem, the session
goal, long-term goals, a plan for
counseling, and ethical concerns
considered
Total Points
Open Ended Questions
Poor
Interviewer's questions could be answered with a "yes" or "no".
Fair
Most but not all of the Interviewer's questions were answered with "yes" or "no"
Good
Interviewer's questions led to discussion without "yes" or "no" answers.
Total Points
Pharaphrasing
Poor
Interviewer never pharaphrased what the interviewee was saying.
Fair
Some of the time the Interviewer pharaphrased, but it was inconsistent.
Good
The Interviewer pharaphrased often and consistently.
Total Points
Social skills
Poor
Interviewer rushed through the interview, speech was difficult to hear or understand, did not pay attention to the client.
Fair
Interviewer paid some attention to the Interviewee, speech was sometimes too quiet or hard to understand.
Good
Interviewer did not speak too fast or too slowly.
Interviewer was attentive to the answers of the interviewee.
Total Points
Introduction
Poor
Interviewer never introduced the topic
Fair
Interviewer mentioned the topic.
Good
Interviewer gave a substantive explanation of the topic under discussion
Total Points
SOLAR
Poor
Interviewer demonstrated SOLAR interviewing skills
Fair
Good
Interviewer did not demonstrate SOLAR interviewing skills
Total Points
Keywords:
SO1(A1,A2) SO2(A1, A2, A3, A4, A5) US: 117865
Subjects:
Communication
Social Sciences
Types:
Presentation
Writing
ePortfolio
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.