Skip to main content
iRubric: Controversies in Science Debate Rubric

iRubric: Controversies in Science Debate Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Controversies in Science Debate Rubric 
Controversies in Science Debate Rubric
Draft of a rubric to be used for evaluation of student debates in my new course.
Rubric Code: X2XBC33
By kashroyer95
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Controversies in Science Debate
  Inadequate

1 pts

Adequate

2 pts

Acceptable

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Understanding of Topic

Inadequate

The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Adequate

The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
Acceptable

The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
Excellent

The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Use of Evidence

Inadequate

Every major point was not supported with facts from the research.
Adequate

Every major point was supported with facts, from the research, but the relevance was sometimes questionable.
Acceptable

Every major point was supported with relevant facts from the research.
Excellent

Every major point was well supported with relevant facts from the research. Many sources of research were used.
Rebuttal

Inadequate

Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Team was unable to defend position.
Adequate

Some counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Team was somewhat able to defend position.
Acceptable

Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Team was able to defend position.
Excellent

All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Team was able to accurately defend position.
Respect for Other Team

Inadequate

Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Adequate

Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Acceptable

Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Excellent

All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Collaboration

Inadequate

Rarely listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Often is not a good team member.
Adequate

Often listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group but sometimes is not a good team member.
Acceptable

Usually listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Does not cause \"waves\" in the group.
Excellent

Almost always listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Tries to keep people working well together.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16