Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Review Game and Q4 Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Review Game and Q4 Project
Review Game and Q4 Project - Conn Yank/Shining Company
Create a board or another three-dimensional game that reviews our study of any of the literature selections from Q3 or Q4,, including plot elements, themes, vocabulary and terms, quotations, cultural and geographical knowledge, and literary terms studied. It should be designed for 2-8 players, be creative, and fun to play.
Rubric Code:
X23CW87
By
KJM1990
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Reading
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Board Game and Final Project
Create a board or other 3D game to play in class designed to involve all players, review for the tests, and be fun to play.
Excellent 20-15
(N/A)
Good 15-10
(N/A)
Fair 10-5
(N/A)
Poor 5-0
(N/A)
Questions/sections
Excellent 20-15
Questions demonstrated considerable knowledge of the novel. All sections are complete and neat. No mistakes found in any section.
Good 15-10
Questions demonstrated basic knowledge of the novel. All sections are mostly complete and neat. 3-4 mistakes found in each section.
Fair 10-5
Questions demonstrated limited knowledge of the novel. All sections are partially complete and somewhat neat. 4-5 mistakes found in each section.
Poor 5-0
Questions demonstrate very little understanding of the novel. All sections are incomplete and not neat. More than five mistakes found in each section.
Design of board or3D aspects of the game
Excellent 20-15
Design is a clear representation of the novel's features, easy to play and rules are well written.
Game board is visually pleasing.
Good 15-10
Design is partly representative of the novel's features, although it may be a tad confusing to play and rules are limited. Game board is some what visually pleasing.
Fair 10-5
Design is somewhat representative of the novel's features, the game is difficult to play and rules are poorly thought out or convoluted. Game board is not visually pleasing and is messy.
Poor 5-0
Design is poor, with little or no relevance to topic. No rules or instructions evident. Game board is messy.
Project presentation
Excellent 20-15
Presentation is professional, eye-catching visually- neat/well organized. Speakers spoke clearly and eye contact was made with audience.
Good 15-10
Presentation is partially professional. Visually the project is not attractive-it's messy/unorganized. Speakers were hard to hear and minimum eye contact was made with audience.
Fair 10-5
Presentation is minimally acceptable.Project is visually unattractive- very messy and not thought out. Speakers were hard to hear and no eye contact was made with audience.
Poor 5-0
Presentation is not acceptable/done.
Speakers spoke over each other and no eye contact was made.
Use of Time/Participation
Excellent 20-15
The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.
Used time well during the class period. Focused on getting the product done. Never distracted others.
Good 15-10
The group worked well with each other and communicated well/ Some members participated slightly more than others.
Used time well during the class period. Usually focused on getting the project done and never distracted others.
Fair 10-5
The group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.
Used some of the class time well during the class period. Some focus on getting the project done but occasionally distracted others.
Poor 5-0
Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Did not use class time to focus on project OR distracted others. Reminders were given.
Quality of Review
Excellent 20-15
Game board demonstrates an interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was well defined.
Good 15-10
Game board demonstrates some interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was somewhat defined.
Fair 10-5
Game board demonstrates lack of interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was not comprehensive.
Poor 5-0
Game board lacks interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was not followed.
Keywords:
Game, board game, final project
Subjects:
English
Geography
Geology
Types:
Project
Reading
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.