Skip to main content
iRubric: Review Game and Q4 Project rubric

iRubric: Review Game and Q4 Project rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Review Game and Q4 Project 
Review Game and Q4 Project - Conn Yank/Shining Company
Create a board or another three-dimensional game that reviews our study of any of the literature selections from Q3 or Q4,, including plot elements, themes, vocabulary and terms, quotations, cultural and geographical knowledge, and literary terms studied. It should be designed for 2-8 players, be creative, and fun to play.
Rubric Code: X23CW87
By KJM1990
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Board Game and Final Project
Create a board or other 3D game to play in class designed to involve all players, review for the tests, and be fun to play.
  Excellent 20-15

(N/A)

Good 15-10

(N/A)

Fair 10-5

(N/A)

Poor 5-0

(N/A)

Questions/sections

Excellent 20-15

Questions demonstrated considerable knowledge of the novel. All sections are complete and neat. No mistakes found in any section.
Good 15-10

Questions demonstrated basic knowledge of the novel. All sections are mostly complete and neat. 3-4 mistakes found in each section.
Fair 10-5

Questions demonstrated limited knowledge of the novel. All sections are partially complete and somewhat neat. 4-5 mistakes found in each section.
Poor 5-0

Questions demonstrate very little understanding of the novel. All sections are incomplete and not neat. More than five mistakes found in each section.
Design of board or3D aspects of the game

Excellent 20-15

Design is a clear representation of the novel's features, easy to play and rules are well written.
Game board is visually pleasing.
Good 15-10

Design is partly representative of the novel's features, although it may be a tad confusing to play and rules are limited. Game board is some what visually pleasing.
Fair 10-5

Design is somewhat representative of the novel's features, the game is difficult to play and rules are poorly thought out or convoluted. Game board is not visually pleasing and is messy.
Poor 5-0

Design is poor, with little or no relevance to topic. No rules or instructions evident. Game board is messy.
Project presentation

Excellent 20-15

Presentation is professional, eye-catching visually- neat/well organized. Speakers spoke clearly and eye contact was made with audience.
Good 15-10

Presentation is partially professional. Visually the project is not attractive-it's messy/unorganized. Speakers were hard to hear and minimum eye contact was made with audience.
Fair 10-5

Presentation is minimally acceptable.Project is visually unattractive- very messy and not thought out. Speakers were hard to hear and no eye contact was made with audience.
Poor 5-0

Presentation is not acceptable/done.
Speakers spoke over each other and no eye contact was made.
Use of Time/Participation

Excellent 20-15

The group worked very well with each other and the presentation was shared equally among the group members.
Used time well during the class period. Focused on getting the product done. Never distracted others.
Good 15-10

The group worked well with each other and communicated well/ Some members participated slightly more than others.
Used time well during the class period. Usually focused on getting the project done and never distracted others.
Fair 10-5

The group communicated relatively well with a few lapses in the presentation; some students dominated the presentation and others did not participate much.
Used some of the class time well during the class period. Some focus on getting the project done but occasionally distracted others.
Poor 5-0

Group did not work well together. There were obvious miscommunications and lapses in the presentation.
Did not use class time to focus on project OR distracted others. Reminders were given.
Quality of Review

Excellent 20-15

Game board demonstrates an interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was well defined.
Good 15-10

Game board demonstrates some interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was somewhat defined.
Fair 10-5

Game board demonstrates lack of interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was not comprehensive.
Poor 5-0

Game board lacks interest and enthusiasm for content material. The story line was not followed.



Keywords:
  • Game, board game, final project



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98