Skip to main content
iRubric: Non-Linear Presentation rubric

iRubric: Non-Linear Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Non-Linear Presentation 
Non-Linear Presentation
This rubric is the assessment tool for your non-linear presentation program.
Rubric Code: X226626
By branbrown
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Presentation
  Good

5 pts

Fair

4 pts

Poor

3 pts

Presentation

Good

The presentation presents the overall topic in a clear and coherent manner. It draws the audience into the presentation with compelling questions or by relating to the audience's interests or goals.
Fair

The presentation shows some structure but does not create a strong sense of what is to follow. It is somewhat appealing to the audience but has incomplete coverage of topic.
Poor

The presentation does not orient the audience to what will follow.
The sequencing is unclear and does not appear interesting or relevant to the audience
Content

Good

Content is written clearly and concisely with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information such as graph and charts.
Information is accurate, current and comes from reliable sources.
Fair

Content is written with a logical prgression of ideas and supporting information such as graphs and charts.
Includes some persuasive information from reliable sources.
Poor

content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a stron sense of purpose.
Includes some persuasive information with few facts. No graphs or charts included
Information is incomplete, out of date and/or incorrect.
Text elements

Good

Fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
Use of italics, bold, and indentations enhances readability.
Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point.
The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Fair

The fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color or busy background detracts and does not enhance readibility
Poor

Overall readability is difficult with lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy backgrounds, overuse of bold or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
Layout

Good

Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space.
Fair

Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or uses a distracting background.
Poor

Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability.
Citations

Good

All sources of information are clearly identified and credited using MLA citations throughout the project.
Fair

Most sources of information use proper MLA citation. Some information, photos and graphics do not use proper MLA citations.
Poor

No way to check validity of information.
Citations lacking.
Graphics, Sound and/or Animation

Good

Graphics, sound and/or animation assist in presenting an overall theme and enhance understanding of concept, ideas and relationships.
Several different types of images are included. Animation includes effective use of linking among slides.
Fair

Some of the graphics, sound and/or animations seem unrelated to the topic/theme and do not enhance the overall concepts. Most images are clip art.
Poor

Graphics, sounds, and/or animations are unrelated to the content or are nonexistant.
Writing Mechanics

Good

The text is written with no errors in grammar, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
Fair

The text is clearly written with little or no editing required for grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
Poor

Spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors distract or impair readability.
(3 or more errors)
Educational Content

Good

Content is educationally aligned to teaching standards, classroom age, and student performance levels.
Fair

Content is somewhat educationally aligned to teaching standards, classroom age, and performance levels.
Poor

Content is NOT educationally aligned to teaching standards, classroom age, and student performance levels.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16