Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Critical Thinking Rubric SUNY System
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Critical Thinking Rubric SUNY System
Critical Thinking Rubric SUNY System
Students will develop well-reasoned arguments
Rubric Code:
WXC736C
By
buzekara
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Education
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critical Thinking assessment
NURSING DEPARTMENT
SUNY BCC
Exceeding
16 pts
Meeting
8 pts
Approaching
4 pts
Not Meeting
0 pts
Articulated Agreement
Students will develop well reasoned arguments
Student's work :
Exceeding
Develops a clearly articulated argument, using evidence and/or systematic logical reasoning in support of a conclusion or point of view
Meeting
Presents an argument using evidence and/or logical reasoning in support of a point of view
Approaching
States a conclusion or point of view but does not organizes the evidence or reasons in a logically adequate way .
Not Meeting
Does not clearly state a conclusion or point of view or else little or no supporting reasoning or evidence is presented.
Qualification
Students will develop well reasoned arguments
Student's work :
Exceeding
Identifies relevant qualification or objection or alternative points of view and prioritizes evidence and/ or reasons in support of the conclusion.
Meeting
Identifies some qualifications or objections or alternative points of view
Approaching
Does not clearly identify or respond to relevant objections or alternative points of view .
Not Meeting
Makes no attempt to recognize or respond to objections or alternative points of view.
Relevance
Students will develop well reasoned arguments
Student's work :
Exceeding
Describes the broader relevance, significance or context of the issues and/or applies the reasoning to a novel problem.
Meeting
Describes the broader relevance, significance of context and /or applies the reasoning to a novel problem.
Approaching
Does not adequately describe the broader relevance or significance or apply the reasoning to a novel problem .
Not Meeting
Makes no attempts to describe the broader relevance or significance or to apply the reasoning to a novel problem.
Keywords:
Articulation of argument
Subjects:
Education
(General)
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Education rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.