Skip to main content
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach rubric

iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach 
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing a coach using wind power.
Rubric Code: WXB94A6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Engineering  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: K-5

Powered by iRubric Engineering Design Process
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Plan

Poor

Little or no evidence was planned out. They did not plan what they were going to build nor plan on what materials to use in the building.
Fair

Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.
Good

Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.
Excellent

I can really see what you are going to be building. All materials were listed and well thought out. I can't wait to see how you build your wind racer.
Design

Poor

Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building. Evidence of research is not shown or missing.
Fair

Some materials were used correctly. Evidence of research is minimal.
Good

Good use of the materials and plan. The airplane was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made. Evidence of research is shown in design.
Excellent

Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great wind racer. Evidence of research is clear in all aspects of your design.
Criteria

Poor

Coach did not meet distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Fair

Coach met some of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Good

Coach met most of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Excellent

Coach met all of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Time Management

Poor

Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the imagine, plan, and design phase of engineering.
Fair

Sometimes used time well. There were times when the group got off task during the imagine, plan, and design phase.
Good

Good use of time, there were a few times when the group got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent

Great use of time. The group stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation

Poor

All or Some group members had to be reminded several times to stay on task.
Fair

Most group members participated during the building process. The group had to be redirected a few times.
Good

The majority of the group members worked together and didn't have to be redirected that much at all.
Excellent

All group members worked together flawlessly and got the job done. The group never had to be redirected.
Presentation

Poor

Final coach is lacking neatness. None of the decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Fair

Final coach is lacking neatness. Few decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Good

Final coach is neat and attractive. Some decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Excellent

Final coach is neat and attractive to look at. All decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16