Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach
Engineering Design Process: Cinderella's Coach
This rubric is used to assess the students' use of the engineering design process for designing a coach using wind power.
Rubric Code:
WXB94A6
By
tkatawick
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Engineering Design Process
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Plan
Poor
Little or no evidence was planned out. They did not plan what they were going to build nor plan on what materials to use in the building.
Fair
Some evidence of a plan. There was some thought to materials/building, but not really thought out.
Good
Good evidence of planning done. Materials were listed and thought out, but the plan wasn't quite complete.
Excellent
I can really see what you are going to be building. All materials were listed and well thought out. I can't wait to see how you build your wind racer.
Design
Poor
Your design lacked materials that were needed. It was really hard for me to tell what you built or were building. Evidence of research is not shown or missing.
Fair
Some materials were used correctly. Evidence of research is minimal.
Good
Good use of the materials and plan. The airplane was nice and well put together, but there were parts that weren't well made. Evidence of research is shown in design.
Excellent
Great use of materials! You maximized your use of materials and created a great wind racer. Evidence of research is clear in all aspects of your design.
Criteria
Poor
Coach did not meet distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Fair
Coach met some of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Good
Coach met most of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Excellent
Coach met all of the distance, functionality, and durability criteria.
Time Management
Poor
Did not use time well. Time was wasted during the imagine, plan, and design phase of engineering.
Fair
Sometimes used time well. There were times when the group got off task during the imagine, plan, and design phase.
Good
Good use of time, there were a few times when the group got off task, but for the majority of the task time was well spent.
Excellent
Great use of time. The group stayed on task during each phase of the process.
Participation
Poor
All or Some group members had to be reminded several times to stay on task.
Fair
Most group members participated during the building process. The group had to be redirected a few times.
Good
The majority of the group members worked together and didn't have to be redirected that much at all.
Excellent
All group members worked together flawlessly and got the job done. The group never had to be redirected.
Presentation
Poor
Final coach is lacking neatness. None of the decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Fair
Final coach is lacking neatness. Few decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Good
Final coach is neat and attractive. Some decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Excellent
Final coach is neat and attractive to look at. All decorations were chosen with the culture of the story's origin in mind.
Subjects:
Engineering
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.