Skip to main content
iRubric: Paper Slide- Maslow's Hierarchy rubric

iRubric: Paper Slide- Maslow's Hierarchy rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Paper Slide- Maslow's Hierarchy 
Vlog Reflection - COMM 200 - Robinson
Create a paper slide video
Rubric Code: WXB946A
By melibaralt
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Vlog Reflection
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Communication
20 %

Excellent

Excellent communication skills. Student uses verbal and nonverbal communication and messaging effectively. Communication skills and interaction with camera are very strong.
Good

Good communication skills. Student uses verbal and nonverbal communication somewhat effectively. Communication skills and interaction with camera are good.
Fair

Verbal and nonverbal communication skills are weak and interaction with camera is ineffective.
Poor

Communication skills, verbal and nonverbal messages along with camera interaction are poor.
Content
25 %

Excellent

The vlog contains an overview of clinical experience. Student reports on all aspects of teacher, student, clinician's experience. Reflection is thoughtful, in depth and looks at all participants
Good

The vlog contains part of an overview of clinical experience. Not all aspects of teacher, student and clinician are discussed. Reflection is not in depth and doesn't cover every participant.
Fair

The vlog contains a minimal overview of clinical experience. Few aspects of teacher, student and clinician are discussed. Reflection is superficial and doesn't cover every participant
Poor

The vlog had no overview. Very little was discussed or reflected on. Significant work is needed to improve.
Content Format
15 %

Excellent

The vlog contained an effective introduction, body, conclusion and transitions that adhered to public address theory.
Good

The introduction, body and conclusion were somewhat apparent but did not effectively demonstrate public address theory.Transitions were lacking.
Fair

Introduction, body, and conclusion were ineffective and transitions were limited or missing entirely.
Poor

Significant improvement needed. Vlog was missing the majority of this information altogether.
Depth of reflection
25 %

Excellent

Clearly ties personal knowledge into the reflection. Clear evidence of reasoned reflection and depth. Provides excellent support for claims.
Good

Good personal reflection with reasoning and insight. Support for claims is evident. Good use of critical thinking.
Fair

Little personal reflection given. Shows some evidence of reasoned reflection. Provides some support for claims. Very little critical thinking.
Poor

No personal reaction given. Did not relate information to what he/she learned. Did not support any claims, or show critical thinking.
Criteria
15 %

Excellent

Assignment met time limit; was submitted at designated time; was edited as appropriate; included images if needed;was professional; adhered to best practices of vlogging.
Good

Assignment almost met time limit; was submitted shortly after designated time; was somewhat edited as appropriate; included some images if needed;was somewhat professional; adhered to some of the best practices of vlogging.
Fair

Assignment didn't meet time limit; was submitted late; was not edited as appropriate; included no images if needed;was unprofessional; adhered to few of the best practices of vlogging.
Poor

Assignment failed to meet most criteria provided, was poor and in need of great improvement.



Keywords:
  • clinical collaboration, future teacher, vlog



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16