Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Self-Learning & Advocacy rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Self-Learning & Advocacy
Self-Learning & Advocacy
Write a 2 -3 page paper in MLA format. Create a PowerPoint Presentation. Information Required: Define your disability, provide background information, prevalance information (how many people have it?), How can it affect student learning?, What strategies can be used to help students with this disability learn or focus?, How can it affect student socialization?, What strategies can be used to help students socialize?, Are you doomed OR will you harness your differences?
Rubric Code:
WXACX72
By
Ls75132012
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Research Paper
Excellent
20 pts
Good
15 pts
Fair
10 pts
Poor
5 pts
Quality of research
Excellent
--Cited 3 or more sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic
--Sufficient information provided to support all elements of topic.
--Research in-depth and the beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Good
--Cited 3 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to thesis.
--Sufficient information provided
--Research of sufficent depth.
Fair
--Failed to cite 3 sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Poor
--Failed to cite sources
--Source reliability questionable. Omitted information does not interfere with ability of reader to find the source.
--Some information relevant to thesis.
--Information provided to support some elements of topic
--Surface research.
Works Cited/Bibliography
Excellent
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- No more errors in format or punctuation.
Good
--All sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- 2 errors in format or punctuation.
Fair
--Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 3 errors in format or punctuation.
Poor
Not all sources properly cited in both paper and bibliography.
-- More than than 4 errors in format or punctuation
Grammar and Mechanics
Excellent
--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met all style and min/max page requirements
Good
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No more than 2 spelling errors.
--Fewer than 1 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 2 punctuation or capitalization errors.
--Met most style and min/max page requirements
Fair
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 3 spelling errors.
--More than 2 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Poor
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--More than 4 spelling errors.
--More than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 4 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Failed to meet style and/or min/max page requirements
Plagiarism
reliance upon sources
Excellent
Student's work is original
- sources cited and not paraphrased
-reliable sources
-does not heavily rely on Wikipedia, or other unreliable sources
Good
Student's work is not original
- relies on paraphrasing
-sources are not reliable
Fair
Student copies and pastes information with citation
Poor
Student's work is merely copied and pasted from sources without citation
Presentation
Excellent
Presentation includes all requirements.
Presentation includes relevant graphics.
Presentation is attractive & interesting.
Good
Presentation includes most requirements.
Presentation includes some relevant graphics.
Presentation is somewhat attractive & interesting.
Fair
Presentation does not include most requirements.
Presentation does not include any relevant graphics.
Presentation is not attractive or interesting.
Poor
Presentation does not include any requirements.
Presentation does not include any graphics.
Presentation is insufficient.
Keywords:
Research Paper & Presentation
Subjects:
English
Psychology
Social Sciences
Education
Types:
Presentation
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.