Skip to main content

- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Social Conditioning Presentation rubric

iRubric: Social Conditioning Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Social Conditioning Presentation Social Conditioning Presentation Students will make a presentation with a well-planned script. The presentation should include well-chosen visuals, subtitles and terse, point-form bullet points to accompany the script. The topic is "What are the 3 (or more) main conditioning factors as you see them in your life?" The presentation should include at least 1, but preferably 2, connections to the literature we've studied in class: Two Kinds; Pancakes; Hamadi; Math and After Math) Rubric Code: WX92733 By MagnoliaBend Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Social Conditioning Presentation Enter rubric description
	Limited INCOMPLETE Partially complete or extremely disorganized 1 pts	Not Sufficient Some effort observed 2 pts	Barely sufficient Lower end of the description 3 pts	Sufficient Higher end of the description 4 pts	Good Lower end of the description 5 pts	Very Good Higher end of the description 6 pts	Excellent Lower end of the description 7 pts	Exceptional Higher end of the description 8 pts
Criterion A 1 pts Analysis analysis of the of the content and context of text (the text being the student's life) justification of opinions and ideas with a range of examples and thorough explanations use of terminology connection to the stories we've studied in class	Limited -LIMITED analysis -RARELY justifies opinions -LITTLE or NO terminology -INACCURATE terminology -MINIMAL connections	Not Sufficient -LIMITED analysis -RARELY justifies opinions -LITTLE or NO terminology -INACCURATE terminology -MINIMAL connections	Barely sufficient -ADEQUATE analysis -SOME examples or explanations -SOME terminology/ inaccurate/imprecise -SOME connections	Sufficient -ADEQUATE analysis -SOME examples or explanations -SOME terminology/ inaccurate/imprecise -SOME connections	Good -COMPETENT analysis -SUFFICIENT examples and explanations -ACCURATE terminology MOST of the time -GOOD connections	Very Good -COMPETENT analysis -SUFFICIENT examples and explanations -ACCURATE terminology MOST of the time -GOOD connections	Excellent -PERCEPTIVE analysis - DETAILED examples and THOROUGH explanations -ACCURATE terminology ALL of the time -PERCEPTIVE connections	Exceptional -PERCEPTIVE analysis - DETAILED examples and THOROUGH explanations -ACCURATE terminology ALL of the time -PERCEPTIVE connections
Criterion B 1 pts Organization use of organizational structures of powerpoint that serve the context and intention organization of pinions and ideas in a sustained, coherent and logical manner with ideas building on each other in a sophisticated way use of referencing and formatting tools to create an effective presentation style.	Limited MINIMAL USE of PPT structures -DOESN'T SERVE INTENTION -MINIMAL COHERENCE -MINIMAL FORMATTING -NOT SUITABLE to intention.	Not Sufficient MINIMAL USE of PPT structures -DOESN'T SERVE INTENTION -MINIMAL COHERENCE -MINIMAL FORMATTING -NOT SUITABLE to intention.	Barely sufficient -ADEQUATE USE of PPT structures -DOESN'T ALWAYS serve intention -SOME COHERENCE -SOME FORMATTING -SOMETIMES SUITABLE to the intention	Sufficient -ADEQUATE USE of PPT structures -DOESN'T ALWAYS serve intention -SOME COHERENCE -SOME FORMATTING -SOMETIMES SUITABLE to the intention	Good -COMPETENT USE of ppt structures -LOGICAL/IDEAS build on each other -COMPETENT USE of formatting tools suitable to intention	Very Good -COMPETENT USE of ppt structures -LOGICAL/IDEAS build on each other -COMPETENT USE of formatting tools suitable to intention	Excellent -SOPHISTICATED organization -LOGICALLY organized -EFFECTIVE PRESENTATION STYLE	Exceptional -SOPHISTICATED organization -LOGICALLY organized -EFFECTIVE PRESENTATION STYLE
Criterion C 1 pts Producing Text -personal engagement with the creative process; -insight, imagination and sensitivity into the role that social conditioning plays in daily life -exploration of new ideas -stylistic choices in terms of visuals in the ppt -awareness of impact on an audience, -details and examples from life and/or the texts to develop ideas.	Limited -LIMITED personal engagement -LIMITED degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -MINIMAL exploration and critical reflection on ideas -MINIMAL stylistic choices in visuals -LIMITED awareness of impact on an audience -FEW relevant details	Not Sufficient -LIMITED personal engagement -LIMITED degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -MINIMAL exploration and critical reflection on ideas -MINIMAL stylistic choices in visuals -LIMITED awareness of impact on an audience -FEW relevant details	Barely sufficient -ADEQUATE personal engagement -SOME degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -SOME exploration and critical reflection on ideas -SOME stylistic choices in visuals -ADEQUATE awareness of impact on an audience -SOME relevant details	Sufficient -ADEQUATE personal engagement -SOME degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -SOME exploration and critical reflection on ideas -SOME stylistic choices in visuals -ADEQUATE awareness of impact on an audience -SOME relevant details	Good -CONSIDERABLE personal engagement -CONSIDERABLE degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -SUBSTANTIAL exploration and critical reflection on ideas -THOUGHTFUL stylistic choices in visuals -GOOD awareness of impact on an audience -SUFFICIENT relevant details	Very Good -CONSIDERABLE personal engagement -CONSIDERABLE degree of insight, imagination and sensitivity -SUBSTANTIAL exploration and critical reflection on ideas -THOUGHTFUL stylistic choices in visuals -GOOD awareness of impact on an audience -SUFFICIENT relevant details	Excellent -HIGH DEGREE of personal engagement -HIGH DEGREE of insight, imagination and sensitivity -PERCEPTIVE exploration and critical reflection on ideas -PERCEPTIVE stylistic choices in visuals -VERY GOOD awareness of impact on an audience -EXTENSIVE relevant details	Exceptional -HIGH DEGREE of personal engagement -HIGH DEGREE of insight, imagination and sensitivity -PERCEPTIVE exploration and critical reflection on ideas -PERCEPTIVE stylistic choices in visuals -VERY GOOD awareness of impact on an audience -EXTENSIVE relevant details
Criterion D 1 pts Using Language -vocabulary, sentence structures -register that serves the context and intention -grammar, syntax and punctuation -effectiveness of communication -pronunciation -use of non-verbal techniques.	Limited LIMITED range of appropriate vocabulary and forms of expression -speaks in an INAPPROPRIATE register and style -LIMITED ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -ERRORS OFTEN HINDER communication -pronounces with LIMITED accuracy; -LIMITED and/or inappropriate use of non-verbal communication techniques.	Not Sufficient LIMITED range of appropriate vocabulary and forms of expression -speaks in an INAPPROPRIATE register and style -LIMITED ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -ERRORS OFTEN HINDER communication -pronounces with LIMITED accuracy; -LIMITED and/or inappropriate use of non-verbal communication techniques.	Barely sufficient ADEQUATE range of appropriate vocabulary and forms of expression -SOMETIMES speaks in an appropriate register -SOME ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -ERRORS SOMETIMES HINDER communication -pronounces with SOME accuracy; -SOME and/or inappropriate use of non-verbal communication techniques.	Sufficient ADEQUATE range of appropriate vocabulary and forms of expression -SOMETIMES speaks in an appropriate register -SOME ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -ERRORS SOMETIMES HINDER communication -pronounces with SOME accuracy; -SOME and/or inappropriate use of non-verbal communication techniques.	Good -VARIED range of appropriate vocabulary, sentence structures and forms of expression -CONSISTENTLY APPROPRIATE register -CONSIDERABLE ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -errors do not hinder communication -pronounces with a CONSIDERABLE degree of accuracy; -SUFFICIENT use of appropriate non-verbal communication	Very Good -VARIED range of appropriate vocabulary, sentence structures and forms of expression -CONSISTENTLY APPROPRIATE register -CONSIDERABLE ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -errors do not hinder communication -pronounces with a CONSIDERABLE degree of accuracy; -SUFFICIENT use of appropriate non-verbal communication	Excellent -EFFECTIVE range of APPROPRIATE vocabulary, sentence structures and forms of expression -CONSISTENTLY APPROPRIATE register -HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -errors are minor and communication is EFFECTIVE, -pronounces with a HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY; -EFFECTIVE use of non-verbal comm.	Exceptional -EFFECTIVE range of APPROPRIATE vocabulary, sentence structures and forms of expression -CONSISTENTLY APPROPRIATE register -HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY in grammar, syntax and punctuation -errors are minor and communication is EFFECTIVE, -pronounces with a HIGH DEGREE OF ACCURACY; -EFFECTIVE use of non-verbal comm.

Keywords:

conditioning; social conditioning; socialization; mental conditioning; conditioning factors

Subjects:

English

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Presentation rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.

n98