Skip to main content
iRubric: Analyzing Experiments - AP Statistics rubric

iRubric: Analyzing Experiments - AP Statistics rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Analyzing Experiments - AP Statistics 
Analyzing Experiments - AP Statistics
Evaluation of a scholarly experiment detailing the results of an experiment and relating it to the key concepts of experimental design.
Rubric Code: W2X83BC
By jhenry_mescairo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Math  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Journal Article Evaluation
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Not attempted

0 pts

Introduction/Summary
10 %

Summarize the main ideas and facts in the article.
Excellent

All main ideas and facts from the article are included. Summary is written in objective view and referencing to the article is provided.
Research questions is discussed.
Good

Summary is mostly correct and objective. Some references to article are provided to support summary statements.
Fair

Some details from article are missing. Summary is not objective OR minimal referencing to the article is provided.
Poor

Summary is very broad with no detail from the article.
Not attempted

No summary is provided OR a verbatim of the text is provided.
Experimental Design
25 %

Evaluate the design principles of the study and the method of the experimental design
Excellent

Study design correctly identified and main features correctly summarized. Subjects/experimental units, treatments, explanatory and response variables appropriately identified. Experimental design principles are described in detail.
Good

One of the five features for excellent experimental design evaluation missing, incorrect, or stated without support from the article.
Fair

Two-three of the features for excellent experimental design evaluation missing incorrect or stated without support from the article..
Poor

Four or five of the features for excellent experimental design evaluation missing or incorrect or stated without support from the article.
Not attempted

Section reads like answers to a list of questions OR almost all pieces are incorrect or missing. No support from article given for statements. OR information is taken directly from the article with little to no paraphrasing.
Statistical Analysis
25 %

Is the analysis appropriate for the study?

What concerns do you have about the study design?
Excellent

Statistical analysis is correctly summarized. Student makes correct evaluation of the appropriateness of the analysis and any descriptive statistics provided. Correct assessment given about testing of assumptions in the article.
Good

One of the three pieces is missing OR all three pieces are there but not completely supported with examples from the article AND material learned in class about the methods.
Fair

Two of the pieces are missing or stated but not well supported.
Poor

More than two pieces missing or not supported.
Not attempted

No evaluation of statistical analysis is given OR it is incorrect OR not supported with evidence from the article.
Conclusions
20 %

Evaluation of the propriety of conclusions for the study
Excellent

Conclusions from the article are correctly stated. Conclusions are evaluated in the context of sample/population and appropriateness of statistical methods.<BR>
Student clearly demonstrates a strong working knowledge of class material relative to the article.
Good

Conclusions from the article are mostly correctly stated. Conclusions are evaluated in the context of sample/population and appropriateness of statistical methods. Student demonstrates some working knowledge of class material relative to the article.
Fair

One of the previous pieces is missing or incorrect.
Poor

Two of the previous pieces are missing or incorrect.
Not attempted

Student does not provide a valid conclusion.
Grammar and Organization
10 %

Excellent

Paper is well organized and easy to follow. There are no spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.
Good

A few transitions between thoughts are awkward OR 2 spelling OR two grammatical errors.
Fair

Some transitions between thoughts are awkward OR 3 - 4 spelling OR 3 - 4 grammatical errors.
Poor

Paper reads like a list of answers to a set of questions OR 5 spelling OR 5 grammatical errors.
Not attempted

Paper is not organized and there more than 5 spelling or grammatical errors
Citations
10 %

MLA format
Excellent

Article is correctly cited in MLA format.
Good

Article is mostly correct using MLA format.
Fair

The article's citation is flawed.
Poor

Article is cited, however it is not done correctly.
Not attempted

The articles are not cited or only the url is provided.



Keywords:
  • article evaluation, statistics



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98