iRubric: Anthropology Group Reading Assessment Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Anthropology Group Reading Assessment Rubric Anthropology Group Reading Assessment Rubric Check list for group presentation Rubric Code: W24CBAA By kkkeasthill Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Criteria
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
1 The content is comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.	Excellent The content is comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.	Good The content is mostly comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.	Fair The content is rarely comprehensive, accurate, and/or persuasive.	Poor The content is not complete and persuasive
2 The presentation develops a central theme or idea, directed toward the appropriate audience.	Excellent The presentation develops a central theme or idea directed toward the appropriate audience.	Good Most of the time the presentation has a central theme or idea directed toward the appropriate audience.	Fair The presentation has a poorly developed central theme or idea directed toward the appropriate audience.	Poor There is no central theme.
3 Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.	Excellent Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.	Good Major points are stated most of the time clearly; are supported most of the time by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.	Fair Major points are rarely stated clearly; are rare supported by specific details, examples, or analysis; and are organized logically.	Poor Major points are not stated clearly, has no specific examples or analysis and are not organized.
4 The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.	Excellent The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.	Good The introduction partly provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.	Fair The introduction minimally provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.	Poor The introduction lacks sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.
5 The presenters spoke loudly, clearly, and were clearly knowledgeable abou their topic.	Excellent The presenters spoke loudly, clearly, and were clearly knowledgeable about their topic.	Good Most of the time the presenters spoke loudly, clearly, and were clearly knowledgeable about their topic.	Fair Part of the time the presenters spoke loudly, clearly, and were clearly knowledgeable about their topic.	Poor The presenters did not spoke loudly, clearly, and were clearly knowledgeable about their topic.