Skip to main content
iRubric: Discussion Forum Rubric

iRubric: Discussion Forum Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Discussion Forum Rubric 
Discussion forum posts should highlight comprehension of the topics/questions, developed through critical analyses and thoughtful considerations of the content. Forums allow participants to share knowledge and viewpoints, professionally, with group members, cultivating a supportive community of learners. By engaging with the material, through meaningful conversations with peers, participants' develop a deeper understanding of the issues presented.
Rubric Code: W2359A8
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Discussion Forum Rubric
Discussion forum posts should highlight comprehension of the topics/ questions, developed through critical analyses and thoughtful considerations of the content. Forums allow participants to share knowledge and viewpoints professionally, with group members, cultivating a supportive community of learners. By engaging with the material, through meaningful conversations with peers, participants' develop a deeper understanding of the issue presented.
  Excellence

5 pts

Proficiency

4 pts

Competency

3 pts

Below Competency

2 pts

Incomplete

0 pts

Posting

Explores, explains, and advances the issue/question assigned. Uses resources and experience to discuss subject matter. Demonstrates analysis on various levels.

Excellence

-Addresses all task requirements and all original prompt components
-Frequently exceeds assigned criteria
-Factually correct, reflective and substantive contributions
-Demonstrates critical thinking in analyses
-Incorporates course resources and/or outside resources to support statements
Proficiency

-80 to 90% of aspects in the task requirements satisfied
-80 to 90% of original prompt components addressed
-Well developed content
-Factually correct, reflective and substantive contributions
-Incorporates course resources to support statements
Competency

-Responses satisfy 60 to 75% of all aspects of the task requirements
-60 to 75% of original prompt components addressed
-Posts adequate content
-Lacks full development of concepts
-Information is factually correct but lacks development and reflections
-Few course or outside sources to support of statements; some personal experiences
Below Competency

-Satisfies few aspects (less than 60%) of the task requirements
-Less than 60% of original prompt components addressed
-Content is insufficient
-Responses are superficial and show little preparation
-Posts incorrect, off-topic, or irrelevant information
-No sources cited (or insufficient source) to support assertions; uses personal experiences only
Incomplete

Does not add an original post
Style & Grammar

College level writing; polished style. Adheres to proper English conventions. Well formatted and spell checked.

Excellence

-College level writing
-Clear, concise comments
-Well formatted
-Eloquent
-Free of grammatical and
spelling errors
-Uses proper English
Proficiency

-Minor clarity issues
-Nicely formatted
-Easy to read style
-Less than 3 grammatical or spelling errors
-Uses proper English
Competency

-Writing is less clear
-Sometimes difficult to read
-Less than 6 grammar or spelling errors
-Uses some slang, cliches, text language
Below Competency

-Long and unorganized posts
-Unclear and hard to read
-Contains multiple spelling and grammatical errors
-Frequently uses slang, cliches, text language
Incomplete

Does not participate
Professionalism

Engages in interactions in a professional and respectful manner. Adhere to etiquette guidelines.

Excellence

-Communicates in a friendly and courteous manner
-Interactions are helpful and supportive
-No unprofessional comments or behaviors
-Follows all etiquette guidelines
Proficiency

-Respectful contributions
-No unprofessional comments or behaviors
-Follows most etiquette guidelines
Competency

-Less professional comments
-Less respectful
-Not supportive
-Follows some etiquette guidelines
Below Competency

-Unprofessional comments or behaviors
-Rude and/or inappropriate content
-Follows a few etiquette guidelines
Incomplete

Does not participate
Timeliness

Timeliness of discussion contributions.

Excellence

-Original post added shorty after forum assigned
-Replies consistently and quickly
-Interactions well distributed throughout forum time frame
Proficiency

-Original post added within 2 days of forum opening
-Timely replies
-Replies somewhat distributed throughout forum time frame
Competency

-Original post added in middle of forum time frame
-Replies shortly after original post (all interactions in less than 2 days) or concentrated near the end of the forum time frame
Below Competency

-Original post added close to the end of the forum time frame
-Replies shortly after original post (interactions only on one day)
-Replies concentrated near the end of the discussion time frame
Incomplete

-Does not participate
References and Support

Quality sources from a variety of mediums. Includes citation for sources.

Excellence

-Always includes references following post with correct formatting
-Sources are scholarly
-Wide variety
Proficiency

-80 to 90% of time Includes references following post with correct formatting
-Quality sources
-Several sources; less variety
Competency

-60-75% of time includes references following post with correct formatting
-Some unreliable or non-scholarly sources
-A few sources; less variety
Below Competency

-Does not include correctly formatted references or few that are included are incorrectly formatted
-Sources are unacceptable
-Very few sources; little variety
Incomplete

Does not participate
Follow-Up Postings

Active participation promotes group interaction. Asks engaging questions, highlights interesting connections, or makes debatable remarks.

Excellence

-Advances the discussion
-Builds on previous posts
-Thorough analysis of peers' posts
-Extends conversation, highlights new connections, incorporates course and/or outside resources
-Takes leadership role in discussions
-Actively contributes to group learning
-Participates more than required
-Monitors forum and actively participates
Proficiency

-Advances the discussion
-Builds on previous posts
-Some analysis of peers' posts
-Incorporates some course and/or outside resources
-Includes relevant personal connections/experiences
-Engages in interactions several times while discussion forum is open
-Participates as directed regarding the # of replies/frequency of posts during time frame
Competency

-Elaborates on parts of an existing posting; adds few advancing comments or observations
-Few resources used to support conversation; supported mainly by personal connections/experiences
-Participation dictated by the least required interactions
-Follows some directions with regards to the # replies and/or frequency of posts during the forum time frame
Below Competency

-Posts shallow contributions (e.g., agrees or disagrees)
-Does not enrich discussion
-Repeats but does not add substantive information to the discussion
-No sources (or insufficient source) cited supporting comments; responses based solely on personal connections/experiences
-Participates less than directed (# of replies/frequency of posts per time frame); replies are late
Incomplete

Does not post any follow-up responses to others



Keywords:
  • Discussion, groups, forum, critical analysis, supporting statements, professionalism, writing, citations

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98