- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Re-creating One Hundred Years of Solitude rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Re-creating One Hundred Years of Solitude Rubric Code: VXAB72B By VivianYingChen Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Foreign Languages Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title 100 % Enter rubric description
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Technology 5 % Enter description Use of technology to make work easier or faster.	Poor The students didn’t use any technology to present their work.	Fair The students used technology to present their work, but only with text and/or pictures of presentation.	Good The students used at least 3 different types of technology to present their work with all kinds of multimedia forms.	Excellent The students used at least 3 different types of technology to present their work with all kinds of multimedia forms, and made the work or the submission neat and pleasant.
list 30 % Integrity and consistency of the list of differences from the original work.	Poor The list doesn’t follow a style, hard to read and distinguish answers.	Fair The list is easy to read, but there are more than 5 conflicts or redundancies.	Good The list is easy to read and there’s only 1-2 conflicts or redundancies.	Excellent Students can integrate conflicting answers in a proper way. No redundancies or conflicts.
Story 40 % The quality of the re-created story.	Poor The student group didn’t re-create a completed story. Or there is a story but the theme has been changed from the original work.	Fair The group has re-created a whole story with a beginning, story progress and an ending without changing the main theme of the original work.	Good The group has re-created a whole story with engaging plots and proper logic without changing the main theme of the original story.	Excellent The group has re-created an engaging story with proper logic and the same theme, and the work is presented well with words or performance or any other format.
Collaboration 5 % Collaboration of the group.	Poor Not every member is participating.	Fair Every member is participating. But the devotion is not even.	Good Every member shares almost the same amount of work.	Excellent Every member share almost the same amount of work, and everyone owns perspectives to the work.
Peer review 20 % How is the peer review.	Poor The student didn’t give a review to a peer.	Fair The student gave a comment with a few words, and no concrete viewpoint.	Good The student has given a reasonable comment with some proofs.	Excellent The student has given very strong and concrete viewpoints with persuading details or proofs.