iRubric: METHODOLOGY IN EFL RESEARCH-UNIVERSIDAD SANTO TOMAS rubric

The observation exercise for data collection was not carried out. It was not subbmitted neither the format, not an evidence of having observed and identified characteristics of the research context.

It was just submitted the evidence of a single observation session, which does not provide the audience any clear evidence of the research idea, (the use of the foreign language) and the regional or specific educational context.

It submitted the observation format, but data gathered in the research context is minimum and not clearly related to the research idea. The role of the researcher was not clearly defined (participant or non-participant).

Two observation formats were submitted, but data did not fulfill the relationship between evidences obtained in the context and the research idea.

It was carried out two solid and detailed collection of data and evidences through observation.

Important aspects were documented in the format, though more evidences and data could have been registered to sustain the research idea.

More than three formats of data collected through observation were submitted in the assignment. Strong and clear evidences of the research idea were gathered through the observation exercise.

The role of the researcher in the context was clearly explained to the audience.

None evidences of emerging reflections were submitted in the assignment.

Missing/Too short-Some ideas were submitted, but they did not correspond to the exercise of interpretation or connection with the research idea.

Three different reflections (field notes) were included in the paper, but the information does not provide new, solid or sustainable information to enrich the research statement.

Three reflections were submitted through field notes. Such information provides descriptions related to the context, but it was not evident the interpretation and description of data clearly related to the research idea.

Reflections were submitted as field notes. Solid information was reported that besides, allowed the audience to see the result of a data collection exercise and the relationship between documented data and the research statement.

Student did not address any ethical concerns before, during or after the data collection exercise according to the guidelines provided by the national teacher.

Ethical considerations could have been more explicit because it was not evident how the pre-service teacher interchanged and collected information with members of the educational community.

Student addressed some ethical concerns, but pictures and other resources were submitted without proper organization and the consent provided by the participants of the community.

Student did addressed all ethical concerns of student interviews. Pictures and other documents were included to support the research, but it would be necessary to write further and detailed examples of how the participants of the context allowed the researcher to collect data.

Information about the participants of the research was clearly presented including ethical considerations: Hidden identity of participants, hidden face pictures, authorization and permission to access the community and register evidences.