Skip to main content
iRubric: COUN 5552 Writing Assignments Assessment (100 Points) rubric

iRubric: COUN 5552 Writing Assignments Assessment (100 Points) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COUN 5552 Writing Assignments Assessment (100 Points) 
COUN 5552 Writing Assignments Assessment (100 Points)
A good reflection... 1. Is authentic. 2. Answers the questions or responds to the statements. 3. Contains examples and details to support opinions and thoughts. 4. Helps the person who wrote it understand him/herself better. 5. Informs the audience and gives useful information. 6. Shows that the person really thought about the question before writing down a response. 7. Shows personal perspective. 8. Is easily understood by the reader. It is free of spelling mistakes as well as confusing language. 9. Is based on what the person believes or thinks about what is asked. 10. Shows thinking.
Rubric Code: VX92275
By matthew_irwin
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Graduate Writing
  Exceeds Competency

Effort at this level evidences mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"

16.66 pts

Meets Competency

Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range

14.99 pts

Developing Competency

Effort at this level represents slightly less than developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B-" to "C" range

13.66 pts

Below Competency

Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below"

10 pts

Response Completion

Exceeds Competency

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Student offers complete and concise responses to all components of the assignment. Responses are well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Writing contains thourough supporting statements relvant to the subject.
Meets Competency

Student offers effective responses to all components of the assignment. Responses are well constructed to help guide the reader throughout the assignment. Most support statments relate to the subject.
Developing Competency

Student offers generally effective responses to all components of the assignment. Responses are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original assignment. Some support statments relate to the subject.
Below Competency

Simple responses that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and somewhat irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Criticial Thinking Skills

Exceeds Competency

Student demonstrates a higher-level of critical thinking than would be expected for 300-400 level work. Learner provides a strategic approach in presenting examples of problem solving or critical thinking, while drawing logical conclusions which are not immediately obvious. Student provides well-supported ideas and reflection with a variety of current and/or world views in the assignment. Student presents a genuine intellectual development of ideas throughout assignment.
Meets Competency

Student exhibits a good command of critical thinking skills in the presentation of material and supporting statements. Assignment demonstrates the student’s above average use of relating concepts by using a variety of factors. Overall, student provides adequate conclusions.
Developing Competency

Student takes a common, conventional approach in guiding the reader through various linkages and connections presented in assignment. However, student presents a limited perspective on key concepts throughout assignment. Student appears to have problems applying information in a problem-solving manner.
Below Competency

Student demonstrates beginning understanding of concepts, but overlooks critical details. Learner is unable to apply information in a problem-solving fashion. Student presents confusing statements and facts in assignment. No evidence or little semblance of critical thinking skills.
Organization of Ideas

Exceeds Competency

Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes well- developed content.
Meets Competency

Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas, concepts, and findings is presented. Overall format of assignment includes developed content.
Developing Competency

Learner applies some points and concepts incorrectly. Student uses some framework that evidences some inconsistencies throughout the writing.
Below Competency

Assignment reveals lack of organization. Student presents incomplete ideas and concepts.
Self-Awareness/Process

Exceeds Competency

Clearly identifies and illustrates as appropriate personal strenghts and growth areas related to the assignment. Student offers concrete examples from his or her life. Effectively communicates successes and growth areas with concrete examples.
Meets Competency

Identifies and illustrates as appropriatepersonal strenghts and growth areas related to the assignment in general terms. Student offers some concrete examples from his or her life. Effectively communicates successes and failures with some abuigious language.
Developing Competency

Generally identifies as appropriate, goals, strengths, weaknesses, confusions, and processes related to the assignment with limited illustrations. Student offers broad or non specific examples from his or her life. Somewhat effective at communicating successes and failures with non specific language.
Below Competency

Unable to idenitfy personal strenghts and growth areas. Student offers broad or non specific examples that are not from his or her own life. Minimally effective at communicating successes and growth areas.
Grammar and Mechanics

Exceeds Competency

Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, responses consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Meets Competency

Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors.
Developing Competency

Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Student’s writing ability is average, but demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.
Below Competency

Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement. Student needs to review and revise assignment.
Use of Computer Technology

Exceeds Competency

Student provides a high-caliber, formatted assignment. Learner exhibits excellent use of computer technology in the development of assignment.
Meets Competency

Assignment presents an above-average use of formatting skills, with less than 4 errors.
Developing Competency

Student demonstrates a basic knowledge of computer applications. Appearance of final assignment demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format and present information.
Below Competency

Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The student may need to take additional training or obtain help while preparing an assignment.



Keywords:
  • rubric graduate writing


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98