Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: I3-Science Innovations- Judging Criteria rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
I3-Science Innovations- Judging Criteria
Science Fair Project Judging Criteria
Rubric to assess student work and completion of science fair project
Rubric Code:
VX57C94
By
lucianna
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Science
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
6-8
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Project Points
Excellent
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Needs work
1 pts
Question/Topic
Excellent
Question/Topic is original, specific, measurable, and realistic.
Very Good
Question/Topic is specific, measurable, and realistic.
Fair
Question/Topic is semi-specific, measurable, and realistic.
Needs work
Question/Topic is broad and/or unrealistic. Student seems to be confused about purpose of project.
Research
Excellent
Research provides student with adequate information to complete the experiment. Provides at least three key words. All research should provide student with background information to complete project.
Very Good
Research is incomplete. Is missing one concept that would provide background information.
Fair
Research is incomplete. Is missing two concepts that would provide background information.
Needs work
Research is incomplete. Is missing three or more concepts that would provide background information.
Hypothesis
Excellent
Hypothesis is testable and directly relates to the purpose. Reasons are given for making this hypothesis.
Very Good
Hypothesis is testable, directly relates to the purpose.
Fair
Hypothesis correlates to the purpose, but is difficult to test.
Needs work
Hypothesis does not answer the research question and is not testable.
Variables
Excellent
Controlled Variables are listed. Independent variable is listed.
Very Good
One variable is missing.
Fair
Two variables are missing.
Needs work
Three or more variables are missing.
Materials and Procedure
Excellent
ALL required materials are listed. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed.
Very Good
Student included all items required. Steps are logical and thorough, easily followed, but one step may be missing or confusing.
Fair
Student included most items required. Steps are logical, but somewhat confusing.
Needs work
Student did not list all necessary items, or use appropriate materials. Steps are not detailed or logical, and/or missing. It would be extremely difficult to follow or duplicate this experiment.
Results (data)/Log Book
Excellent
Completed as many trials as necessary to collect enough data. Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 2 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Very Good
Results are easily interpreted and are represented in at least 1 of the following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Fair
Results are not easily interpreted and are represented in only 1 of following ways:
___Narrative
___Charts/Graphs
___Photos/Videos
___Illustrations
Needs work
It is unclear what the data represents without referring to the written results.
Conclusion
Excellent
Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, and discusses possible explanations for results. Student also explains how they would conduct experiment differently next time.
Very Good
Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation. Student explains if hypothesis was correct or incorrect, showing an understanding of the scientific process.
Fair
Conclusion answers the question based on research and experimentation, but leaves some confusion.
Needs work
Conclusion is confusing and/or does not answer the research question. Student does not attempt to explain if hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
Display Board/Graphics
Excellent
Display shows an obvious attention to detail and is decorated neatly. All steps of the Scientific process show a logical order. Student provided two or more appropriate graphics.
Very Good
Display shows some attention to detail and is neatly decorated. Most steps show a logical order. At least two appropriate graphics were used.
Fair
Display is decorated moderately neat. Parts of the Scientific process may be out of order or confusing. Student provided one or two appropriate graphics.
Needs work
Display is not neat and/or seems haphazardly thrown together. Steps of the Scientific process do not show a logical order. Appropriate graphics were not provided.
Originality
Excellent
Impressive, well executed
Very Good
Creative, new interpretation
Fair
Common experiment
Needs work
Not original
Comprehension
Excellent
Shows definite understanding and appropriate use of scientific theory, terms, techniques, and methodologies
Very Good
Shows understanding of scientific theory
Fair
Shows some understanding of scientific theory
Needs work
Missing understanding of scientific theory
Organization and completeness
Excellent
Thorough, complete, with ALL supporting data and information
Very Good
Thorough, complete, with MOST supporting data and information
Fair
Thorough, complete, with SOME supporting data and information
Needs work
Missing parts and supporting data and information
Effort and Motivation
Excellent
Project shows great effort and motivation
Very Good
Projects shows effort and motivation
Fair
Project shows some effort and motivation
Needs work
Project is missing effort and/or motivation
Clarity
Excellent
Project and ideas are very clear and easy to follow
Very Good
Project and ideas are clear and easy to follow
Fair
Project and ideas are somewhat clear, may not be easy to follow
Needs work
Project and ideas are not clear, not easy to follow
Keywords:
science and technology
Subjects:
Science
Types:
Project
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Science rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.