Skip to main content
iRubric: Architectural In Progress Drawings rubric

iRubric: Architectural In Progress Drawings rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Architectural In Progress Drawings 
Architectural Initial Sketches
Given client based specifics and several site options, students are to prepare and complete a working set of Drawings. Each stage of the process is to be graded separately although stages are not expected to be 100% complete there will be a certain amount of completion expected according to what has been covered in curriculum at the time.
Rubric Code: VX34433
By Wbriant
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Architectural Working Drawings
100 % to establish a grade for work in progress submitted at critical stages for complete working drawings
  Unsatisfactory

25 pts

Below Standard

50 pts

Meets Standard

75 pts

Meets or Exceeds

100 pts

Accuracy of Design
15 %

Proper traffic flow,
structural continuity,
matching clients expectations, realistic functionality.
Unsatisfactory

not much thought in layout. no equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were not met. There are many issues with structural integrity, The functionality of the spaces does not work.
Below Standard

not much thought in layout. there are inadequate equipment accommodations, poor traffic flow, most of the clients request were met. There are some issues with structural integrity, The functionality of some of the spaces does not work well.
Meets Standard

Carefully thought out layout. there are equipment accommodations, traffic flow works okay,most of the clients request were met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Meets or Exceeds

Carefully thought out layout. Proper equipment accommodations, traffic flow works well, the clients request were all met. There are no issues with structural integrity, The functionality of all the spaces works well.
Participation in class
35 %

drawing/reviewing initial plans. Asking questions throughout revisions and final drafting. progressing steadily through final drawings stage
Unsatisfactory

most time in class was not spent working on initial plans,rough drafts, reviews w/instructor. Constantly required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Below Standard

Some of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. frequently, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 3+ days of the required class time.
Meets Standard

Most of Time in class spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing w/instructor and making revisions. Occasionally, required redirection of time management throughout the project. Absent 1-2 days of the required class time.
Meets or Exceeds

Time in classroom spent working on initial plans, preparing rough drafts, reviewing with instructor and making revisions. Very good self time management displayed throughout the entire project start to completion. Present for entire class requirements
Overall Impression
25 %

Neatness
completeness
on schedule
comprehensiveness
Unsatisfactory

Working set of drawings is less than 80% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is not assembled properly, not understandable, no organization. Not submitted on time.
Below Standard

Working set of drawings is between 80-100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done. Not submitted on time.
Meets Standard

Working set of drawings is less than 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done and submitted on time.
Meets or Exceeds

Working set of drawings is 100% complete per semester syllabus specifications. The set is assembled properly, understandable, neatly done and submitted on time.
Dimensioning notes/labels
25 %

dimensions accurate
dimensions complete
notes accurate
notes complete
schedules complete
Unsatisfactory

No Dimensions were present on the project. Schedules were incomplete or inaccurate schedules.
Below Standard

Dimensions were present on the some of the project with inaccuracies that effected overall understanding. All schedules were completed but with some inaccuracies.
Meets Standard

Dimensions were present on the majority of the project with several inaccuracies that did not effect overall understanding. All schedules were completed.
Meets or Exceeds

Great time and effort was spent to ensure 100 % accurate notes/dimensions throughout the entire project. All schedules were completed and accurate.



Keywords:
  • floor plans, working drawing, house layout, blueprints,dimensions,elevations


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98