Skip to main content
iRubric: Technology Interview rubric

iRubric: Technology Interview rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Technology Interview 
Students will interview 2 or more people that are involved with technology rollout planning for schools, districts, or companies. Then, develop a reflection of the interviews.
Rubric Code: V2X47W4
By VDUTTON
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Technology Rollout Interview
50 %
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Requirements Followed
10 %

Excellent

Two or more people interviewed; All Interviewees are persons involved with the school, district or company technology rollout to employees or students.
Good

Two people interviewed; Half of the Interviewees are persons involved with the school, district or company technology rollout to employees or students.
Fair

One person interviewed; One or None of the Interviewees are persons involved with the school, district or company technology rollout to employees or students.
Needs Improvement

No interview was conducted.
Consent to Interview
10 %

Permission to conduct interview
Excellent

Copy of consent to interview all included in interview was submitted with recording.
Good

Missing a copy of consent to interview from one person.
Fair

Verbal consent on recording was given
Needs Improvement

No consent to interview was submitted.
Questions
10 %

Type of questions asked and the correct amount of questions asked.
Excellent

Five or more questions were asked in each interview. Questions are open-ended. Questions designed to draw out information from person interviewed.
Good

Three to Four questions were asked in each interview.
Some open-ended questions. Some questions were designed to draw out information from person interviewed.
Fair

All questions are yes/no response or number of questions varied in the interviews (less than five). Few questions were open-ended. Questions were not designed to draw out information from person interviewed
Needs Improvement

Student did not ask any questions. Interviewees spoke about the topic on their own.
Clarity of Interview
10 %

Sound quality of recording (interviewer clear to hear and clear responses from interviewee)
Excellent

The interviews are extremely clear to hear. The interviewees are descriptive with their responses about the topic.
Good

The interviews are mostly clear to hear. The interviewees are mostly descriptive with their responses about the topic.
Fair

Either the interviewer or the interviewees are not easy to hear during the interviews. Some of the interviewees responses are vague.
Needs Improvement

The interviewer and the interviewees are not heard clearly during the interviews. The interviewees are vague with responses.
Submission Accessibility
10 %

Interview technology use
Excellent

This submission was able to be opened and reviewed from Blackboard.
Good
Fair
Needs Improvement

Submission not able to be opened and reviewed from Blackboard.
REFLECTION
50 %
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

5 pts

Needs Improvement

1 pts

Requirements Followed
15 %

Excellent

All paper submission guidelines are followed (pages, margins, font, length, etc.)
Good

Most of the paper submission guidelines are followed (pages, margins, font, length, etc.)
Fair

A couple of the paper submission guidelines are followed (pages, margins, font, length, etc.)
Needs Improvement

None of the paper submission guidelines are followed (pages, margins, font, length, etc.)
Content
15 %

Elements: use of technology to enhance departmental management;
key steps in the technology rollout procedure;
areas of improvement; and
strengths of the technology rollout system
Excellent

Report reflects thoroughly on the interviews, including all elements that were asked for. Shows a full understanding of the topic.
Good

Report includes a general reflection of the interview, may include most of the elements that were asked for. Shows somewhat of an understanding of the topic.
Fair

Report includes a brief reflection of the interview, may include some of the elements that were asked for. Written form of topic is not completely clear to understand.
Needs Improvement

Report is incomplete, does not include any of the elements that were asked for. Shows that there is no understanding of the topic.
Grammar/Punctuation
10 %

Excellent

There are no spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in the submission.
Good

There are a few spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in the submission.
Fair

There are some spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in the submission.
Needs Improvement

There are many spelling, grammar or punctuation errors in the submission which hinder the ability to understand the document.
Timely Submission
10 %

Excellent

Submission is turned in on time.
Good
Fair
Needs Improvement

Submission is turned in late.



Keywords:
  • Technology, Interview

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98