Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: 520 Ethical Theory Paper rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
520 Ethical Theory Paper
Leadership Development Plan
Rubric Code:
V2W89A5
By
jdovel
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Communication
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Ethical
Below average
9 pts
Average
11 pts
Above average
13 pts
Superior
15 pts
Introduction/conclusion
Below average
No thesis statement. Purpose of paper not explained.
Average
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Above average
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Somewhat explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement.
Superior
Student sets up thesis and goals in introduction. Clearly explains purpose of paper. Student refers back to thesis statement and makes strong final statement.
Content
Below average
--Responses unclear or non-existent.
--Or, support for case study insufficient.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent.
Average
--Responses too broad or narrow for length of paper and/or poor for case study.
--Support for responses barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Above average
--Responses somewhat broad or narrow for length of paper and/or questionable for case study.
--Support for responses sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Superior
--Responses interesting, of appropriate breadth for length of paper and appropriate for case study.
--Support for responses complex, complete, and in-depth.
--Writer involved with subject, not merely doing an assignment.
--Clear and appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Comprehension
Below average
--did not apply learned knowledge to case
--did not make connections between cases and law
Average
--minimally applied knowledge to case
--made some connections between cases and law
Above average
--above average application of knowledge to case
--made good connections between cases and law
Superior
--superior application of knowledge to case
--superior connections between cases and law
Grammar and Style
Below average
-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--More than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- More than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Average
-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 5 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- Fewer than 3 punctuation or capitalization errors.
Above average
-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Superior
--Consistent and appropriate voice, use of third person.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns/antecedents, or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Format/research
Below average
--no outside research
--did not follow format
Average
--minimal outside research
--somewhat followed format
Above average
--some outside research
--followed format with one error
Superior
--outside research that added to argument
--followed format
Ethical Theories
Below average
Section contains only 1-2 ethical theories or lacks depth.
Average
Section is missing several ethical theories or misuses several ethical theories.
Above average
Section is missing 1-2 ethical theories or misuses 1-2 ethical theories.
Superior
Displays a clear understanding of theory to include the ethical gap, utilitarianism, individual rights, ethical dilemma, the want versus need self, and other theories.
Ethical Issues
Below average
Numerous problems with a clear understanding of ethical issues to include incentives, regulation, discrimination, bad behavior and responsibilities. Examples include the Big Short, IBM in Germany, Wells Fargo, baseball steroid scandal, Enron and the Pinto cases.
Average
Several problems with a clear understanding of ethical issues to include incentives, regulation, discrimination, bad behavior and responsibilities. Examples include the Big Short, IBM in Germany, Wells Fargo, baseball steroid scandal, Enron and the Pinto cases.
Above average
1-2 problems with a clear understanding of ethical issues to include incentives, regulation, discrimination, bad behavior and responsibilities. Examples include the Big Short, IBM in Germany, Wells Fargo, baseball steroid scandal, Enron and the Pinto cases.
Superior
Displays a clear understanding of ethical issues to include incentives, regulation, discrimination, bad behavior and responsibilities. Examples include the Big Short, IBM in Germany, Wells Fargo, baseball steroid scandal, Enron and the Pinto cases.
Personal Ethical Solutions
Below average
Numerous problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Average
Several problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Above average
1-2 problems exist with describing how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Superior
Fully describes how you personally as a future leader can and will combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Organizational Ethical Solutions
Below average
Numerous problems with describing how organizations can combat unethical behavior in organizations. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Average
Several problems with describing how organizations can combat unethical behavior in organizations. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Above average
1-2 problems with describing how organizations can combat unethical behavior in organizations. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Superior
Fully describes how organizations can combat unethical behavior in organizations. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory from class materials or research.
Regulatory/Governmental Solutions
Below average
Numerous issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.
Average
Several issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.
Above average
1-2 issues with describing how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.
Superior
Fully describe how governments and regulatory organizations can combat unethical behavior. The solution is backed by supported ethical theory and past failures from class materials or research.
Keywords:
Case Study Research
Subjects:
Business
Communication
English
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.