Skip to main content
iRubric: Spanish 2 Review: Spanish (Board) Game rubric

iRubric: Spanish 2 Review: Spanish (Board) Game rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Spanish 2 Review: Spanish (Board) Game 
Semester FINAL Project: Spanish (Board) Game
You & a partner will create a Spanish game that covers what we've seen & done in 2! Questions and answers are to be Spanish & range in complexity. Your team MUST be able to answer them all for your game. ALL games must have instructions, a game board, & the grammar component Topics: SER y ESTAR, SABER y CONOCER, PROFESSIONS y verbo QUERER, Future Tense, Reflexive, Informal & Formal commands.
Rubric Code: UXBWX8A
By AQNorvell
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Academic Content
  STRONG

100 pts

GOOD

90 pts

FAIR

80 pts

WEAK

70 pts

POOR

60 pts

Questions?Answers

STRONG

On time, thorough, relevant, good range of difficulty, showing attention to detail, answers are accurate.
GOOD

1 of the following: incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
FAIR

2 of the following: incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
WEAK

3 or more: incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
POOR

4 or more: incomplete, irrelevant, unchallenging, inaccurate.
Accuracy of Content

STRONG

All information cards made for the game are correct.
GOOD

All but one of the information cards made for the game are correct.
FAIR

All but 2 of the information cards made for the game are correct.
WEAK

Several information cards made for the game are not accurate.
POOR

More than 8 of information cards made for the game are not accurate.
Instructional Effectiveness

STRONG

Winning the game requires learning the content. The two are matched completely.
GOOD

Winning and learning are closely entwined, though some mental effort is spent on aspects that are just about the game.
FAIR

Significant cognitive effort is spent on things that have nothing to do with the content.
WEAK

The content is incidental. One can play without learning much.
POOR

The content is not aligned with the game and one can play with learning little.
Knowledge Gained

STRONG

ALL students in group could easily and correctly state several facts about the topic used for the game without looking at the game.
GOOD

ALL students in group could easily and correctly state 1-2 facts about the topic used for the game without looking at the game.
FAIR

Most students in group could easily and correctly state 1-2 facts about the topic used for the game without looking at the game.
WEAK

Several students in group could NOT correctly state several facts about the topic used for the game without looking at the game.
POOR

None of the students in group could correctly state facts about the topic used for the game without looking at the game.
Use of Spanish

STRONG

Board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
GOOD

Most of the board, rules, etc. presented in Spanish with English translations if necessary.
FAIR

Some.
WEAK

Almost none.
POOR

None
Participation (within group, ranked

STRONG

Particpated fully and found ways to build on knowledge through process.
GOOD

Made some effort but still left others with brunt of work.
FAIR

Limited; made no effort to increase knowledge to help out.
WEAK

Almost none.
POOR

None
The Game Itself
  STRONG

10 pts

GOOD

9 pts

FAIR

8 pts

WEAK

7 pts

POOR

(N/A)

Rules

STRONG

Rules were written completely and clearly enough so that all could easily participate.
GOOD

Rules were written, but one part of the game needed slightly more explanation.
FAIR

Rules were written, but people had some difficulty figuring out the game.
WEAK

Unwritten.
POOR
Attractiveness

STRONG

Contrasting color and at least 3 original graphics.
GOOD

Contrasting color and at least 2 original graphics.
FAIR

Contrasting color and 1 original graphic.
WEAK

Little or no color, fewer than 3 graphics.
POOR
Creativity

STRONG

The group put a lot of thought into making the game fun and interesting to play as shown by creative questions, game pieces, and/or game board.
GOOD

The group put some thought into making the game intersting and fun to play by using textures, fancy writing, and /or interesting characters and board.
FAIR

The group tried to make the game interesting and fun, but some of the things made it hard to understand/enjoy the game,.
WEAK

Little thought was put into making the game interesting and fun.
POOR
Others' Reactions

STRONG

Found the game engaging and worthwhile, would play again!
GOOD

Found the game somewhat engaging and worthwhile, might play again!
FAIR

Thought the game could use further development and then could be engaging.
WEAK

Ranked as unplayable.
POOR





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16