Skip to main content
iRubric: Diaspora Missiology Presentation rubric

iRubric: Diaspora Missiology Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Diaspora Missiology Presentation 
Luke-Acts Theme Presentation
Each learning team picks a diaspora community in the United States and researches it in terms of its culture, history, current setting, and mission options/activity. The team will present the findings to the class. The presentation may take on a variety of forms but must come with a prepared electronic student study sheet.
Rubric Code: UXA5A58
By RenateHood
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Humanities  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Diaspora Missiology Presentation
  Exceeds

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

Quality of project
25 %

Exceeds

Project was extremely organized, interesting, and easy to follow.
Project fully explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed advanced critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Good

Project was organized. Information presented was clear and interesting. Project explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Fair

Project was fairly organized. Information presented fairly clear. Project fairly explored the diaspora community in its context; it showed a fair degree of critical thinking and application of knowledge gathered.
Poor

Project was poorly organized; and/or information was presented was unclear at times; and/or project poorly explored the diaspora community in its context; and/or it showed poor thinking and little application of knowledge gathered.
Unacceptable

Project was not organized; and/or information presented was unclear; and/or project did not explore the diaspora community in its context; and/or it showed no critical thinking or application of knowledge gathered.
Classroom Presentation
25 %

Exceeds

Presentation was presented in a professional way. Audio and visual aspects were perfect. Group members were able to answer all questions posed by the other students as well as the professor.
Good

Presentation was audible. Good tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project were organized and easy to read. Group members were able to answer most questions posed by professor and other students.
Fair

Presentation was audible, but needs improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project could be better organized and easier to read. Group members were mostly
unable to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Poor

Presentation was somehwat audible, but needs lots of improvement on tone of voice when speaking. Visual aspects of project need improvement. Group members were not able to answer some questions when asked by professor or other students.
Unacceptable

Presentation was not clearly audible and hard to hear. Visual presentation was very disorganized and hard to read. Group members did not ask for questions and were unable to answer questions asked by other students or the professor.
Preparedness
20 %

Exceeds

Students showed that they were completely prepared and demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject area.
Good

Students showed that they were prepared sufficiently and demonstrated sufficient knowledge of the subject area.
Fair

Students seemed to be prepared but one person seemed to carry the success of the presentation.
Poor

Students seemed to be somewhat prepared but should have communicated more as a team.
Unacceptable

Students did not seem prepared to present.
Applied Diaspora Missiology
15 %

Exceeds

The group clearly understood and applied diaspora missiology and its multiple aspects.
Good

The group basically understood and applied diaspora missiology.
Fair

The group somewhat understood diaspora missiology and applied it in a limited way.
Poor

The group exhibited a poor understanding of diaspora missiology and/or poorly applied it.
Unacceptable

The group both misunderstood and failed to apply diaspora missiology.
Electronic Student Study Sheet
15 %

Exceeds

The group prepared a clear, interactive, and informative electronic student study sheet.
Good

The group prepared a clear and informative electronic student study sheet.
Fair

The group prepared an electronic student study sheet but it lacked in content and organization.
Poor

The group prepared an electronic student study sheet but it was of poor quality.
Unacceptable

The group did not have an electronic student study sheet.



Keywords:
  • Missiology presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16