Skip to main content
iRubric: Anatomy and Physiology Presentation rubric

iRubric: Anatomy and Physiology Presentation rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Anatomy and Physiology Presentation 
Students will research and present a complete overview of a disease or illness related to a body system covered in this course.
Rubric Code: UX9AC38
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Medical  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Grading Criteria
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

2 pts

(-) Effort

0 pts

Overall Delivery

Organization, Creativity, Engaging

Excellent

Presentation is excellent, extremely organized, interesting, creative, and easy to follow. Demonstrates originality.
Good

Presentation is clear and understandable, interesting, and organized.
Fair

Presentation is fairly organized, slightly engaging.
Poor

Presentation is unclear, unorganized, unengaging, difficult to follow.
(-) Effort

Did not present material to class.
Visual Aids

Development, Use, Relevancy, Enhancing

Excellent

Excellent development and use of multiple visual aids. Visual aids were relevant and enhanced learning.
Good

Good use and development of visual aids. Visual aid(s) enhanced the presentation and related to the material.
Fair

Adequate use of at least one visual aid. Visual aid slightly enhanced the presentation. Poor development of visual aids. Questionable relevancy.
Poor

Poor visual aids, did not enhance/relate to topic.
(-) Effort

No forms of visual aids presented.
Content

Diagnosis Name, Explanation,<BR>
Causes/Risk Factors,<BR>
Clinical Manifestation,<BR>
Diagnostic Procedures,<BR>
Treatment

Excellent

Presentation thoroughly covers all 6 content requirements. Information presented is accurate and appropriately related.
Good

Presentation covers 5 -6 content areas accurately.
Fair

Presentation covers 3-5 content areas. Inaccurate information is minimal.
Poor

Presentation covers 1-2 content areas with inaccuracies and a lack of thoroughness.
(-) Effort

No content areas were covered in this presentation, or all information presented was inaccurate.
Grading Criteria
  Excellent

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

(-) Effort

0 pts

Professional Speaking

Eye Contact, Enthusiasm, Audible

Excellent

Excellent eye contact, showed enthusiasm through entire presentation, and was easily understood. Spoke about subject with authority and ease.
Good

Maintained eye contact and showed enthusiasm most of the time. Voice was clear and understandable, minimal fillers used. Appeared calm, had a general grasp of information.<BR>
Minimal reliance on notes.
Fair

Occasionally used eye contact. Difficult to hear, excessively used "ums" or other fillers. Frequent pauses for him or her to find their place. Too much reading, reliance on notes.
Poor

No or minimal eye contact. Voice was inaudible, mumbled, or otherwise not understood. Did not seem to know the material. Heavy reliance on notes.
(-) Effort

Did not speak/present.
Topic

Relevancy, Correlation

Excellent

Disease/illness correlates to an appropriate system covered in this course. Chosen topic requires research and in-depth discovery.
Good

Disease/illness correlates to an appropriate system. Topic selected requires minimal research.
Fair

Disease/illness correlates to a system not covered in this course.
Poor

There is no correlation between a disease/illness and a body system. Presentation is completed on an inappropriate, unrelated topic.
(-) Effort

Did not research and present a topic.
Time

Excellent

Lasts 10-20 minutes with time devoted to content.
Good

Lasts less than 10 or more than 20 minutes devoted to content.
Fair

Lasts less than 8 or more than 30 minutes devoted/undevoted to content.
Poor

Presentation lasts between 2 and 5 minutes, or needs to be stopped by the instructor due to excessive time.
(-) Effort

Presentation lasted between 0 and 2 minutes.
Peer Review

Excellent

Class rating is excellent.
Good

Class rating is good.
Fair

Class rating is fair.
Poor

Class rating is poor.
(-) Effort

Class did not assign any points to the presenter for the project/presentation.



Keywords:
  • Anatomy, Medical







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16