Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Timed Writing Basic Rurbic rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Timed Writing Basic Rurbic
This rubric was created from the 2016 AP English Literature and Composition Scoring Guide: https://secure-media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/ap/ap16_english_literature_sg.pdf
Rubric Code:
UX66B92
By
gdiaz24
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
From the AP Lit Scoring Guide
Little Success (0-2)
60 pts
Inadequate (3-4)
70 pts
Adequate (5-6)
85 pts
Effective (7-8)
95 pts
Thesis
Little Success (0-2)
Unacceptably brief. or incoherent. Little clarity, organization, or supporting evidence. Fail to offer adequate analysis. Oversimplified understanding of the prompt. Incomplete thesis (does not answer all parts of the prompt).
Inadequate (3-4)
Fail to offer adequate analysis. Oversimplified understanding of the prompt. Incomplete thesis (does not answer all parts of the prompt).
Adequate (5-6)
Reasonable analysis, but less thorough and less perceptive than Effective essays. Simplistic understanding of the text.
Effective (7-8)
Well-focused and persuasive analysis.
Topic Sentences
Little Success (0-2)
Little to no organization. Specific arguments are hard to find. Mostly plot summary.
Inadequate (3-4)
Specific arguments are hard to find. Mostly plot summary.
Adequate (5-6)
Shows insight and understanding
Effective (7-8)
Shows specific insight and understanding.
Evidence
Little Success (0-2)
Relies mostly on plot summary. Unfocused, repetitive presentation of ideas, an absence of textual support. Off-topic, inadequate, or completely irrelevant examples used.
Inadequate (3-4)
Relies mostly on plot summary. Unfocused, repetitive presentation of ideas, an absence of textual support.
Adequate (5-6)
Less specific supporting detail; relies on plot summary.
Effective (7-8)
Apt and specific textual support
Analysis
Little Success (0-2)
Little coherent discussion of the text. Analysis is partial, unsupported by evidence, or irrelevant. Significant misreading.
Inadequate (3-4)
Analysis is partial, unsupported by evidence, or irrelevant. Significant misreading.
Adequate (5-6)
Shows some insight and understanding; less perceptive/specific than Effective essays. Plausible reading, but superficial or thinly developed.
Effective (7-8)
Makes a strong case for their interpretation and discusses the literary work with significant insight and understanding; more sophisticated analysis.
Style and Format
Little Success (0-2)
Errors in control of language are distracting; Student did not write in pen, AND/OR underlined titled in the hand-written copy and italicized in the typed copy.
Inadequate (3-4)
Lack control of language; Student did not write in pen, AND/OR underlined titled in the hand-written copy and italicized in the typed copy.
Adequate (5-6)
Adequate control of language; Student wrote in pen, underlined titled in the hand-written copy and italicized in the typed copy.
Effective (7-8)
Effective control of language; Student wrote in pen, underlined titled in the hand-written copy and italicized in the typed copy.
Subjects:
Humanities
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.