Skip to main content
iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

iRubric: Annotated Bibliography rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Annotated Bibliography 
Use the APA 6th Ed formatting guidelines for annotated bibliographies. Choose empirical research articles, textbook sources, research publications, and/or online resources.
Rubric Code: U225AB5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Annotated Bibliography of Resources
  Basic

1 pts

Proficient

2 pts

Distinguished

3 pts

APA formatting

Basic

APA style formatting included, but contained errors i(E.g.spacing, punctuation or capitalization).
Proficient

Few APA formatting errors, e.g. authors of study, spacing, capitol letters.
Distinguished

APA formatting was accurately followed, and included correct placement of authors' names, title of study, spacing guidelines, etc. 1
Critical Summary

Basic

Inadequate description of study, how study was undertaken, results of study & recommendations or applications to present research or your interest area.
Proficient

Aspects of summary included but some of the important information was missing.
Some annotations merely summarize the source.
Brief summary and assessment of the reference (type of research, participants, major findings, quality and rigor of the reference, etc.)
Distinguished

All important information was described well, why study was conducted, where, methods, results, and application.

Brief reflection of how the reference relates to other references included in the bibliography (How does this reference challenge, corroborate, complicate, etc. other references cited in the bibliography?)
Critical Assessment

Basic

Writing not clear, run-on sentences used, topic sentence not clearly stated. The assessment only included minor reference to bias, accuracy, and/or comparison.
Proficient

Writing needs work but shows good foundation from which to work.
After summarizing the sources, an evaluation was completed, but lacked detail and analysis.
Distinguished

Writing clear, clear presentation of ideas, highly developed comparison and evaluation of all sources.
Critical Reflection

Basic

A reflection was included in some, but not all of the annotations. Did not include a connect to practice or accurately depict the source's usefulness for educators.
Proficient

A reflection was included in all annotations. Some of the reflections lacked depth of personal connection.
Distinguished

A critical reflection was included in each. The reflections included connections the author made to current practice.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98