Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Rubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Rubric Analytical Philosophical Inquiry
Rubric Analytical Rhetorical Essay
communication/persuasive argument development. You must cite at least three examples or quotes as evidence and explain why they are relevant to your thesis.
Rubric Code:
TXC35XA
By
t00046343
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Philosophy
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Analytical Philosophical Inquiry
Master
4 pts
Approaching Expert
3 pts
Apprentice
2 pts
Trying Hard!
1 pts
Claim
Master
The claim is clearly discernible and it is stated along with three logical reasons as part of overview. The argument is sound and consistently supported with well-chosen evidence from the particular theorist.
Approaching Expert
The claim takes a clear position. Argument and evidence may at times be strained. One support paragraph may veer off topic, or examples from the particular theorist may be lacking.
Apprentice
The claim is weak, wordy, and/or garbled. The main
argument and/or evidence is weak or does not always support the claim. Supporting pars. may veer off topic.
Trying Hard!
No claim. Argument and evidence do not connect or support one point. All
supporting paragraphs are disconnected.
Organization
Master
Essay is focused and organized by design. Clearly demonstrates the application of and conclusion derived from each of the three criteria.
Pars. have clear topic/concluding sentences; body paragraphs include counterarguments with refutation & effective transitions.
Approaching Expert
Essay is organized.
Has a topic and concluding sentences; body paragraphs may include counterarguments and refutation, or not; and/or lack transitions; and/or lack an overall design. Infers the application of and conclusion derived from the three criteria.
Apprentice
Some confusion due to lack of organization. Has weak topic and/or concluding sentence; and body paragraphs include weak counterargument and ineffective rebuttal. Transitions are weak or absent. Allusion to the criteria but lacks direct application and conclusion.
Trying Hard!
No organization.No apparent topic is present, and/or concluding sentence is missing; body paragraphs lack counterarguments and/or rebuttal. No transitions. Topical or trite mention of the criteria. Discursive.
Analysis
Master
Claim is fully developed and supported by research emanating from case study. Evidence is vivid and relevant. Analysis shows insightful reflection with highly effective use of persuasive strategies.
Approaching Expert
Claim is well developed and supported with good evidence. Analysis shows understanding with some use of persuasive strategies. Information that is relevant pertaining to case study.
Apprentice
Claim is not well supported by evidence. Analysis is partly understood and demonstrated; inconsistent persuasive strategies.Allusion to case study
Trying Hard!
Claim is not supported by evidence or analysis. Case study hardly mentioned and no expository research evident.
Voice & Tone
Master
Consistently uses a variety in word choice and sentence structure.
Strong unique voice adds polished style to the writing; tone is consistent with purpose throughout.
Approaching Expert
Shows some variety in word choice and/or sentence structure.
Uses own voice, but style may be rough. Tone is consistent with purpose, but may include one or two abrupt shifts
Apprentice
Not enough variety in sentence structure and/or word choice.
Voice and tone are well suited, but do not stand out or are highly inconsistent.
Trying Hard!
Sentence structure is repetitive and word choice is basic. Voice is undeveloped and tone is inconsistent.
Citation
Master
Sources as solid evidence are cited and applied. All quotes & paraphrases are introduced in essay using title and author of content quoted. Elegant flow and engaging to read. Primary sources evident. Article(s) from databases.
Approaching Expert
4-5 sources are present. All quotes & paraphrases introduced using title and author; essay is correctly composed using rhetorical format.
Source may be original document. Some sources are primary and articles are from databases.
Apprentice
3-4 sources are cited but may lack description. Quotes & paraphrases may be introduced using title and/or author, yet essay is not composed correctly in rhetorical format. Most sources are not primary source and derive from www.
Trying Hard!
Fewer than 3 sources are cited. Quotes & paraphrases are not introduced; essay not composed correctly in rhetorical format. Little or no research regarding case study/
Mechanics
Master
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation are few and do not interfere with the reader's or audience's understanding.
Approaching Expert
Semi-frequent errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation do not interfere with understanding.
Apprentice
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation sometimes interfere with understanding.
Trying Hard!
Errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation prevent reader from fully understanding the essay.
Subjects:
English
Philosophy
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.