Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Theories of clinical psychology WORKBOOK rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Theories of clinical psychology WORKBOOK
Theories of clinical psychology WORKBOOK
This rubric to be applied to all 6 entries of the workbook. Maximum points per entry is 5% Maximum points for the total workbook is 30% Be mindful of word limits
Rubric Code:
TXB8673
By
ssherrod
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Domain
Exemplary
4 pts
Developing
3 pts
Insufficient
2 pts
Did not address
0 pts
Nominated perspectives
Exemplary
Nominated perspectives are identified, essential qualities summarised and defined, and appropriate developer(s) named
Developing
ONE of: Nominated perspectives are not clearly identified, OR essential qualities are not well-summarised or well-defined, OR appropriate developer(s) are not named
Insufficient
TWO or more: Nominated perspectives are not identified / essential qualities are not summarised or defined / appropriate developer(s) are not named
Did not address
Did not address
Context
Exemplary
Historical AND cultural context, salient factors that shaped the theory, and core philosophical assumptions clearly considered and well-discussed
Developing
ONE of: Historical OR cultural context, salient factors that shaped the theory, or core philosophical assumptions not CLEARLY considered or well-discussed
Insufficient
TWO or more: Historical AND cultural context / salient factors that shaped the theory / core philosophical assumptions not considered or well-discussed
Did not address
Did not address
Therapeutic relationship
Exemplary
Importance and centrality of the relationship, relevance to the model, AND process of relationship development well-discussed well-discussed
Developing
ONE of: Importance and centrality of the relationship, relevance to the model, OR process of relationship development not well-discussed
Insufficient
TWO or more: Importance and centrality of the relationship / relevance to the model / OR process of relationship development not well-discussed
Did not address
Did not address
Therapeutic technique
Exemplary
Describes the theory of change (e.g., positive reinforcement), identifies the mechanisms of change (e.g., resolved transference), and what the goals of the therapy would typically be (e.g., behaviour change, improved insight, etc.)
Developing
Fails to describe ONE of: the theory of change, the mechanisms of change, OR the presumed goals of the therapy
Insufficient
Fails to describes TWO or more of: the theory of change, the mechanisms of change, OR the presumed goals of the therapy
Did not address
Did not address
Effectiveness of the therapy
Exemplary
Draws on empirical literature / clearly compares selected model with two others / strengths, limitations, and controverseys clearly identified and well-discussed
Developing
Fails to identify and discuss ONE of: basis in empirical literature / comparison of selected model with two others / strengths, limitations, and controverseys
Insufficient
Fails to identify and discuss TWO or more of: basis in empirical literature / comparison of selected model with two others / strengths, limitations, and controverseys
Did not address
Did not address
Overall structure
Exemplary
Format has been adhered to (see headings)
Developing
Format is adequate but not compliant (may have a missing heading or one section is not clearly identifiable)
Insufficient
Format has not been adhered to (uses alternate headings or none at all)
Did not address
Did not address
Approved/On-Time
Exemplary
Wild card theory was approved by teaching staff before workbook began. Final workbook was submitted on time.
Developing
Wild card theory was not approved by teaching staff before workbook began OR final workbook was not submitted on time.
Insufficient
Wild card theory was approved by teaching staff before workbook began AND final workbook was submitted on time.
Did not address
Did not address
Keywords:
psychotherapy
Subjects:
Psychology
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Psychology rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.