Skip to main content
iRubric: Lab Conclusion and Analysis rubric

iRubric: Lab Conclusion and Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Lab Conclusion and Analysis 
Lab Conclusion and Analysis
Student uses the 6 steps for writing a good lab conclusion after performing the lab.
Rubric Code: TXB2A26
By ssassetti
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Chemistry  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Categories
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Step 1- Purpose

Poor

Purpose for doing this lab is missing.
Fair

Purpose for doing this lab is somewhat outlined with little or no explanation
Good

Purpose for doing this lab is clearly outlined with some explanation
Excellent

Purpose for doing this lab is clearly outlined with detailed explanation
Step 2- Hypothesis Revisited

Poor

Hypothesis is not clearly restated with supportive quantitative and qualitative data and results to back up claim.
Fair

Hypothesis is somewhat restated but lacks solid supportive quantitative data and results to back up claim.
Good

Hypothesis is clearly restated with some supportive quantitative data and results to back up claim.
Excellent

Hypothesis is clearly restated with supportive quantitative data and results to back up claim.
Step 3-Pertinence to lesson

Poor

Relationship to lesson is neither clearly explained nor trends or patterns highlighted.
Fair

Relationship to lesson is somewhat explained but lacks highlighting of trends or patterns.
Good

Relationship to lesson is discussed but trends or patterns are not clearly highlighted.
Excellent

Relationship to lesson is discussed and trends or patterns logically analyzed.
Step 4- Error Analysis

Poor

There is no discussion of errors.
Fair

Experimental errors are mentioned.
Good

Experimental errors, their possible effects, are discussed.
Excellent

Experimental errors, their possible effects, and ways to reduce errors are discussed.
Step 5- Prior/New knowledge gained

Poor

No reference to new knowledge or prior knowledge. No ways to improve or other possible experiments are given
Fair

Somewhat describes specific skills, concepts, and new information learned but lacks connection to prior knowledge. Few ways to improve or other possible experiments are given
Good

Clearly describes specific skills, concepts, and new information learned with some connection to prior knowledge. Ways to improve or other possible experiments are given
Excellent

Clearly describes specific skills, concepts, and new information learned making appropriate connection to prior knowledge. A vast knowledge of ways to improve or other possible experiments are given
Step 6- Grammer

Poor

There are more than 4 I, me, you, we used in the writing. There are more than 4 spelling errors.
Fair

There are more than 3 I, me, you, we used in the writing. There are more than spelling errors.
Good

There are more than 2 I, me, you, we used in the writing. There are more than 2 spelling errors. .
Excellent

There are more than 1 I, me, you, we used in the writing. There are more than 1 spelling errors.



Keywords:
  • Purpose, hypothesis, analysis,error analysis, connecting prior knowledge, Real world applications

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16