Skip to main content
iRubric: News Story Rubric

iRubric: News Story Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
News Story Rubric 
News Story Rubric
Basic news story
Rubric Code: TXA292W
By sabrynac77
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Standards
  Unacceptable

1 pts

Poor

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

4 pts

Excellent

5 pts

Lead

Unacceptable

Lead is non-existent. Lead does not relate to story's main facts.
Poor

Lead is weak and contains little necessary information. Does not address News Determinants. Does not grab listeners attention. Lead trivializes the story. Lead is too broad and/or vague.Lead is incorrect.
Fair

Lead contains necessary information, but is weakly composed or awkward. Includes most of essential 7 news determinants. Does little to grab listeners attention. Lead emphasizes less important facts or contains too many facts.
Good

Lead is well-written and contains basic, necessary information - direct lead. Includes necessary News determinants. Grabs listeners attention. Lead is a good summary of the story's most important point or is written to regain listeners attention - delayed lead
Excellent

Engaging and dynamic lead is written clearly and without error. I Fully engages listeners attention.
Organization

Unacceptable

Story lacks any organizational structure. Information is not presented in a logical way. The angle of the story is not the actual story.
Poor

Organizational structure is limited. Story is disjointed most of the time, but some of the information follows the inverted pyramid or narrative storytelling format.
Fair

The story contains the elements of basic organization. Information follows the inverted pyramid or narrative storytelling format at a basic level.
Good

The information follows a coherent inverted pyramid structure or narrative storytelling format.
Excellent

Information is deftly organized by importance, and there is an overwhelming logic to the order in which it is written.
Sources

Unacceptable

Story has no obvious sources.
Poor

Poor choice for an interview subject - not credible.
Fair

Story uses multiple sources, but uses them ineffectively. Obvious source who should have been included was not included.
Good

Story has a credible source that comments on most important element of the story.
Excellent

Story has the most logical and credible source possible. No obvious omissions are present. Demonstrates creativity and thought in selection of source.
Quotes

Unacceptable

Story lacks direct or proper attribution.
Poor

Story has a few quotes that are only marginally interesting. Information that should have been paraphrased and attributed is often quoted directly.
Fair

Article has some meaningful quotes, but from too few sources. Information that should have been paraphrased and attributed is occasionally quoted directly.
Good

Article has good number of sources and some interesting quotes that are attributed properly. Paraphrased quotes are attributed properly.
Excellent

All direct quotes are interestingly said; from interesting and appropriate sources; and attributed properly. Paraphrased quotes are attributed properly.
AP style/grammar

Unacceptable

Significant errors in grammar and writing make story unacceptable. Significant problems with subject-verb agreement.
Poor

Grammar and writing mistakes make story hard to follow or comprehend. Frequent problems with subject-verb agreement.
Fair

Some grammar or mechanics issues. Some problems with subject-verb agreement.
Good

Few issues with grammar or mechanics. Subject-verb agreements throughout.
Excellent

Sophisticated grammar and mechanics add to style of story. Subject-verb agreements throughout.
Writing: Flow

Unacceptable

Writing doesn't flow. Language is imprecise and boring. Sentences are wordy and repetitious.
Poor

Writing mostly doesn't flow. Language is frequently imprecise and boring. Sentences are frequently wordy and/or repetitious.Contains too many numbers.
Fair

Writing occasionally doesn't flow. Language is occasionally imprecise and boring.Sentences are occasionally wordy and/or repetitious.
Good

Writing mostly flows well, although there are rough spots. Language is occasionally interesting. Sentences are occasionally wordy and/or repetitious.
Excellent

Writing flows well, is concise and contains interesting language. Sentence length is varied. Avoids wordiness and unnecessary repetition.
Digital elements

Unacceptable

No digital elements identified.
Poor

Almost no digital elements identified or elements that do not add to story.
Fair

Some digital elements were identified, but did not vary in type.
Good

Some digital elements were identified. Varied in type.
Excellent

Digital elements were thoughtful, added to story but did not replace text. Variety of elements identified.



Keywords:
  • Journalism, Articles, Leads, Inverted Pyramid

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16