Skip to main content
iRubric: Photojournalism digital portfolio rubric

iRubric: Photojournalism digital portfolio rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Photojournalism digital portfolio rubric 
This is a digital portfolio final rubric for the MCOM7 photojournalism class at San Joaquin Delta College in Stockton, California.
Rubric Code: TX98XCX
By hpitto
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Journalism  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Photojourn digital portfolio final
  Unsatisfactory

0 pts

Poor

4 pts

Fair

6 pts

Good

8 pts

Excellent

10 pts

Photos

Unsatisfactory

There are not images for any of the assignments.
Poor

Some assignments are missing images.
Fair

There is only one image per assignment.
Good

There are only 1-2 images per assignment.
Excellent

There are 3-4 images per assignment.
Cutlines- length

Unsatisfactory

Cutlines were not considered.

** If you missed more than one photo assignment — and they were not excused — you will be graded as unsatisfactory.
Poor

One or more photos are missing cutlines.

** If you missed one photo assignment — and it was not excused — you will be graded as poor.
Fair

ALL photos are accompanied by cutlines one to two sentences in length, but the cutline is not a complete sentence or states the obvious.
Good

ALL photos are accompanied by cutlines which are one to two complete sentences and mostly avoid stating the obvious.
Excellent

ALL photos are accompanied by cutlines which are two or more complete sentences and avoid stating the obvious.
Cutlines- Five w's and h

Unsatisfactory

Cutlines were not considered, not detailed, or missing on most images.

** If you missed more than one photo assignment — and they were not excused — you will be graded as unsatisfactory.
Poor

The who, what, where, when, why — and how (if applicable) — are mostly missing in the images.

** If you missed one photo assignment — and it was not excused — you will be graded as poor.
Fair

The who, what, where, when, why — and how (if applicable) — are partially addressed in the images.
Good

The who, what, where, when, why, — and how (if applicable) — are mostly addressed according to each image.
Excellent

The who, what, where, when, why — and how (if applicable) — are all addressed according to each image.
Cutlines- Identification

Unsatisfactory

Cutlines were not considered, not detailed, or missing on most images.

** If you missed more than one photo assignment — and they were not excused — you will be graded as unsatisfactory.
Poor

People in the picture who are seen clearly are not identified.

** If you missed one photo assignment — and it was not excused — you will be graded as poor.
Fair

Only some people in the picture who are seen clearly are identified. There is not a pattern in doing the IDs.
Good

Most people in the picture who are seen clearly are identified. There is a pattern in doing the IDs.
Excellent

All people in the picture who are seen clearly are identified.

**Be sure to follow a pattern in doing the IDs, and tell your reader the pattern (“left to right”, etc.)
AP Style

Unsatisfactory

AP style was not considered.

** If you missed more than one photo assignment — and they were not excused — you will be graded as unsatisfactory.
Poor

Most photos and the video are missing AP style in the captions.

** If you missed one photo assignment — and it was not excused — you will be graded as poor.
Fair

Some photos or the video are missing AP style for the captions.
Good

All photos/video(s) are accompanied by cutlines in near perfect AP style.
Excellent

All photos/video(s) are accompanied by cutlines in perfect AP style.
Resume

Unsatisfactory

Resume missing.
Poor

Resume not uploaded in PDF format and not in the resume section.
Fair

Resume not uploaded in PDF format, but it is in the resume section.

Resume missing most items or most items out of order.
Good

Resume uploaded in PDF format to the resume section.

Resume missing some items or some items out of order.
Excellent

Resume uploaded in PDF format to the resume section.

Resume lists colleges attended, degrees or certificates in progress or obtained. Resume lists skills in alphabetical order. Resume lists jobs in order from recent to oldest with brief description and dates worked.
About Me/bio

Unsatisfactory

Website missing about me/bio section entirely.
Poor

About me/bio section is not a paragraph or is missing more than two elements.
Fair

About me/bio section is a paragraph but is missing two elements.
Good

About me/bio section is a paragraph but is missing one element.
Excellent

Website has about me/bio section that tells readers who you are, what you do, what they'll find on your site, and any other pertinent information in a paragraph (five sentences).
Mechanics

Unsatisfactory

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure are unsatisfactory.
Poor

Poor grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Fair

Fair grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Good

Grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure are good.
Excellent

Excellent grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Professional Photo

Unsatisfactory

Website is missing a photo of yourself entirely or photo provided is not of you.
Poor

Website contains a selfie as the "professional-looking photo," but it is not on your about me/bio section.
Fair

Website contains a professional-looking headshot, but it is not on your about me/bio section.
Good

Website contains a selfie as the "professional-looking photo" on your about me/bio section.
Excellent

Website contains a professional-looking headshot on your about me/bio section.
Sections

Unsatisfactory

There was no attempt to make separate sections.
Poor

Four of the sections are combined.
Fair

Three of the sections are combined.
Good

Two of the sections are combined. Ex: photos and video are on same page.
Excellent

There are individual sections for each: photos, video(s), resume, contact, and about me/bio.
DEADLINE
Website URL

Unsatisfactory

Website URL not sent to instructor's Delta College email by the Monday, May 21, 2018 1:50 p.m. deadline. (NO CREDIT)
You will receive a ZERO ON YOUR ENTIRE PORTFOLIO for anything submitted after the given date/time or sent to the wrong email.
Poor

N/A
Fair

N/A
Good

N/A
Excellent

Website URL sent to instructor's Delta College email by the Monday, May 21, 2018 1:50 p.m. deadline. (50 points)




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98