iRubric: Guillotine model and Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Guillotine model and Paper

Tale of Two Cities Art Project and Paper

The student will create a three dimensional guillotine. The guillotine will be displayed with a backdrop, representing Paris during the French Revolution. Additionally, the student will research the history of the guillotine and write a paper of at least 250 words. A bibliography must be included.

Rubric Code: TX52XC3

By hope1964

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Novel
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Fair 10 pts	Poor 5 pts
Appearance	Excellent Model is neat and helps the viewer to understand the mechanics and appearance of a guillotine.	Good The model is neat and intact. The viewer can easily identify the model as a guillotine.	Fair The appearance is either messy or disorganized. The viewer has a hard time recognizing the model as a guillotine.	Poor Messy and disorganized. The viewer can not recognize the model as a guillotine.
Effort/Creativity	Excellent Excellent effort and originality! Very Creative!	Good Effort is apparent, some creativity.	Fair Some effort was used, but not very creative	Poor Little effort, little creativity
Research paper content	Excellent Accurately explains the history of the guillotine and exhibits an understanding of how it relates the events of the French Revolution.	Good Explains most aspects of history of the guillotine, it's importance, and how it relates to the French Revolution.	Fair Explains one or two elements of the history of the guillotine and displays a rudimentary knowledge of the importance of the guillotine and how it relates to the French Revolution .	Poor Paper missing.
Research paper mechanics	Excellent Paper began with a strong, clear thesis and was followed by supporting details, was free from spelling and punctuation errors, used effective transitions, sophisticated vocabulary, and clear and sequential organization.	Good Thesis was in need of some refinement, but good analysis of topic with supporting details. Few errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, or sentence structure.	Fair Thesis was somewhat clear with minimal analysis and supporting details. The errors in spelling, punctuation, or grammar and numerous and distracting.	Poor Thesis was missing or was unclear. Details did not support thesis. Paper had formatting, punctuation, or grammar errors. Paper lacked introduction or conclusion or transitions.
Bibliography	Excellent Bibliography follows standard MLA format.	Good Bibliography has slight variation from formatting norms.	Fair Bibliography does not follow MLA format.	Poor Bibliography missing