Skip to main content

iRubric: Communications Course rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Communications Course 
Rubric Code: TX46X22
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Education  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Communications Course
  Excellent

15 pts

Satisfactory

10 pts

Needs Improvement

5 pts

Planning Documents

Excellent

All planning documents were complete, and links to them were on the final project document.
Satisfactory

All planning documents were linked to the final projected, but were missing details or not properly filled out.
Needs Improvement

Planning documents were missing, not filled out properly, and there were many missing details.
Framework Application

Excellent

The chosen framework was applied to the project to create constructivist, online, inquiry based activities. A paragraph was written in the project planning document that described how it will be used to guide lesson planning.
Satisfactory

The chosen framework was applied to the project to create some constructivist, online, inquiry based activities, but the project still used many instructor lead methods to teach the materials. The paragraph did not fully explain how the framework would be utilized to guide how lessons were planned.
Needs Improvement

The chosen framework was not well applied to the project. Most of the activities were instructor lead, and did not require active student centered methods. The framework was mentioned, but the paragraph explaining how it will be used was missing from the planning document
Lesson Plans

Excellent

The lessons stated the goals, objectives, rationale, instructional events, TEKS, and evaluation measures. The were written with enough detail that they could be implemented by other instructors without further directions.
Satisfactory

The lessons stated the goals, objectives, rationale, and instructional events, TEKS, and evaluation measures. The lessons need further elaboration to be implemented by others.
Needs Improvement

The lessons were missing various components, and were not well elaborated. They need to be further developed with more explanations to be understood by others.
Mini-course Completion

Excellent

The mini course contained at least three or four lessons that would take roughly fifteen hours to finish, making it 30% percent complete. There was a link where the materials could be viewed.
Satisfactory

The mini course contained at least three or four lessons that would take roughly ten to twelve hours to complete, making it less than 30% finished. There was a link where the materials could be viewed.
Needs Improvement

The mini course was missing lesson plans and had less than ten hours worth of materials. The link was missing or did not work.
Mini-Course Content

Excellent

The course was easy to read and understand, well sequenced, and contained synchronous communication competencies using web and video conferencing software in professional contexts.
Satisfactory

The course was generally easy to read and understand. There were only a few times during instruction where the information or directions were unclear. The materials were sequenced, but could use more consideration on the flow of information or building of human capabilities from lower level skills to HOTS. Web conferencing software was used, but not in professional contexts, or without a focus on teaching communication competencies.
Needs Improvement

The course was not clear or hard to understand at multiple times throughout the instruction. The materials were not logically sequenced, and took no consideration of learners' abilities. The course did not use video or web conferencing software.
Screencast

Excellent

Screencast included an overall explanation of the project, planning documents, and the course that was authored. It also discussed how the project used video and web conferencing to teach synchronous communication for professional contexts.
Satisfactory

The screencast discussed the project, but was vague about the planning or did not show many of images of the authored course. The web conferencing was discussed, but not in details.
Needs Improvement

The screen cast discussed the project, but was too short (three minute or under), and did not give adequate details on how to implement the lessons. The web conferencing was mentioned or left out all together.
Collaboration

Excellent

Worked well with team members without altercations, completed assigned roles/responsibilities, and commented on at least two classmates' mini-courses.
Satisfactory

Generally worked well with team members with only a few minor disputes, completed assigned roles/ responsibilities, and commented on at least one classmates mini-course.
Needs Improvement

Did not work well with team members, and did not complete all assigned roles/responsibilities. Only commented on one mini-course.
Grammar & Mechanics

Excellent

There was only a few grammatical or spelling errors, none of which affected the readability of the text.
Satisfactory

There was a couple of grammatical and spelling errors, some of which affected the readability of the text.
Needs Improvement

There was many grammatical and spelling errors that seriously affected the readability of the text.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243