Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Art History Formal Analysis Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Art History Formal Analysis Rubric
Art History Formal Analysis Rubric
Formal Analysis Assignment for GARTH 206
Rubric Code:
T2288A6
By
lleonleloraf
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
100 pts
Very Good
85 pts
Average
75 pts
Undeveloped
65 pts
Unacceptable
55 pts
Summary & Submission
25 %
Excellent
- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent
- Submitted completed handout on time
Very Good
- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is coherent
- Submitted completed handout on time
Average
- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use resources and describe the object
- analysis is vague, but object is fully described
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date
Undeveloped
- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use resources and is unable to clearly describe the object
- Submitted handout incomplete or not on due date
Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the discussion.
- Handout not submitted; missing portions of the assignment
Content & Development
25 %
Excellent
- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Clear and well integrated formal description of art connects to analysis and references course content
- Purpose of the writing are clear.
Very Good
- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Clear formal description of art to support analysis and references course content
- Purpose of the writing are clear.
Average
- Art fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is not comprehensive and /or clear
- Description included but lacking detail to fully respond to assigned questions
Undeveloped
- Art not fully identified: Title; culture; date.
- Content is incomplete.
- Formal description included but vague
- Questions were not adequately answered
Unacceptable
- Art not identified and unacceptable.
- No formal descriptions
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
Organization & Structure
25 %
Excellent
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Handout is thoughtfully completed
- Paragraph transitions are logical
Very Good
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
- Handout thoughtfully completed
- Paragraph transitions present.
Average
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Handout complete
Undeveloped
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Handout incomplete
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Unacceptable
- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Format & Length
15 %
Excellent
- Paper fulfills length requirements
-Format enhances readability of paper.
- Font and spacing correct
- Photograph included
Very Good
- Paper fulfills length requirements
- Occasional error
- Photograph included
Average
- Paper is over or under word length.
-Text not formatted correctly
- Photograph included
- Paper is not double spaced
Undeveloped
- Paper is inadequate or excessive in length.
- Photograph included
- Text is not formatted correctly AND paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable
- Unacceptable
- Student did not follow assignment guidelines
- Photograph missing
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
10 %
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display varied structure.
Average
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Undeveloped
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable
- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or did not to complete significant portions of the assignment.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.