Skip to main content
iRubric: Weekly Online Discussion Rubric: Learning Module #2 Tues/Th

iRubric: Weekly Online Discussion Rubric: Learning Module #2 Tues/Th

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Weekly Online Discussion Rubric: Learning Module #2 Tues/Th 
Weekly Online Discussion Rubric: Learning Module #2 Tues/Th
Rubric Code: SXCWC57
By hardipa13
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Weekly Online Discussion Rubric
Learning Module #2
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Superior

5 pts

Assignment Responsiveness

Responsiveness to discussion assignment prompt
Poor

50% or less of the prompt addressed
Fair

Up to 75% of the prompt components addressed
Good

Up to 90% of the prompt components addressed
Excellent

All components of discussion prompt
Superior

All components of discussion prompt addressed in an insightful manner
Reading Application

Application of assigned reading(s)
Poor

Postings reflect no evidence of assigned readings or movie/video viewings
Fair

Very unclear that readings or movie/video viewings were understood by incorporation into postings
Good

Somewhat unclear that readings or movie/video viewings were understood by incorporation into postings
Excellent

Somewhat clear that readings or movie/video viewings were understood by incorporation into postings
Superior

Very clear that readings or movie/video viewings were understood by incorporation into postings
Discussion Responsiveness

Responsiveness to learning module resources
Poor

No evidence that any learning module resources have been read/viewed/completed
Fair

At least one point from one of the learning module resources has been read/viewed/completed clearly built upon/refuted
Good

More than one point from one of the learning module resources has been read/viewed/completed clearly built upon/refuted
Excellent

More than one point from at least two of the learning module resources has been read/viewed/completed clearly built upon/refuted
Superior

Multiple points from multiple learning module resources clearly built upon/refuted
Posting Timeliness

Timeliness of discussion contributions
Poor

Not Posted
Fair

Posted later than one week after due date OR does not include a citation for at least one reference other than the textbook
Good

Posted late, but within one week of due date OR does NOT include a citation for at least one reference other than the textbook
Excellent

Posted late, but within two days of due date and includes a citation for at least one reference other than the textbook
Superior

Posted on time and includes a citation for at least one reference other than the textbook
Post is Required Length

Quantity of contributions
Poor

Post is less than one paragraph, double-spaced
Fair

Post is less than two paragraphs, double-spaced
Good

Post is less than three paragraphs, double-spaced
Excellent

Post is less than one full page, double-spaced
Superior

Post is more than one full page, double-spaced
Discussion Protocol

Adherence to discussion protocol
(prompt or questions posed)
Poor

Does not discuss the Snowman Elementary Video Case Study
Fair

Cited the intelligences featured in the Snowman Elementary Video Case,<BR>
but didn't discuss how they are demonstrated or if the teacher implements the instruction effectively
Good

Cites the intelligences featured in the Snowman Video Case and discusses in general how they are demonstrated by the teacher
Excellent

Cites the intelligences featured in the Snowman Video Case and discusses in detail how they are demonstrated by the teacher, but doesn't judge the effectiveness
Superior

Cites the intelligences featured in the Snowman Video Case and discusses in detail how they are demonstrated by the teacher and evaluates the effectiveness of the teacher's implementation with supporting examples and details
Discussion Protocol

Adherence to discussion protocol (prompt or questions posed)
Poor

Does not discuss the Snowman Gender Equity Video Case Study
Fair

Discusses how the Snowman Gender Equity Video Case Study addresses the problem of gender bias, but doesn't discuss the strategies used by the group leaders
Good

Discusses how the Snowman Gender Equity Video Case Study addresses the problem of gender bias and briefly mentions the strategies used by the group leaders
Excellent

Discusses how the Snowman Gender Equity Video Case Study addresses the problem of gender bias the strategies used by the group leaders
Superior

Discusses how the Snowman Gender Equity Video Case Study addresses the problem of gender bias the strategies used by the group leaders in great detail with supporting examples



Keywords:
  • discussions onlinecourse

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98